• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Brown loses Sun newspaper backing

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    But that's not really an objective way to judge the state of an industry. I mean, does anyone have a partner that doesn't come home and spend half an hour raging about the stress-outs in the office? My missus used to work as a guide for the National Trust and you'd think she was in charge of air traffic control at Heathrow, FFS.
    No. In my experience teachers are the worst for doing this.

    Oh the news is on and the Beeb can't let this Sun headline go
    Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
      I picked the 80's because my maths teacher explained how it worked when I did my A Levels. Back then the A level was self regulating. About 40% had to fail and the grades were set on percentages - so A would only be given to the top say 2.5%. The distribution of scores would essentially follow the same normal distribution and chopping that 40% at the end maintained the A Level status.
      I clearly remember the Dean of Science telling us at the beginning of the first uni year that having gained places there we were in the "top 2%" (whatever that really meant).

      The catching up to the same level TLG mentions was done in the first term and was necessary because different examining boards had different curricula. Very few dropped out or were ejected. I only recall 2 lads from my courses who disappeared at the end of the first year - one because he was impatient to start earning and the other because he was a lazy twunt.
      Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Sysman View Post
        I clearly remember the Dean of Science telling us at the beginning of the first uni year that having gained places there we were in the "top 2%" (whatever that really meant).

        The catching up to the same level TLG mentions was done in the first term and was necessary because different examining boards had different curricula. Very few dropped out or were ejected. I only recall 2 lads from my courses who disappeared at the end of the first year - one because he was impatient to start earning and the other because he was a lazy twunt.
        That catch up thing was common because it brought everybody to the same point because, as you say, different examining boards cover different portions of the course to a greater or lesser extent. What we have now is the uni having to teach the students the things they would reasonably expect them to already know. This is because the kids are only taught what they need to know to pass the exam rather than the subject itself.

        It would be interesting to see how a maths student from today would cope with an A Level paper from 20 or 30 years ago. That would be a good test.
        Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

        I preferred version 1!

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by dang65 View Post
          I'm not a dedicated Labour voter
          Oh come come now

          Originally posted by dang65 View Post

          a load of stuck up toffs
          I think you're showing your true colours here, proper little class warrior aren't we?
          For the record, I can't wait until next June when hopefully we are going to see the labour party consigned to the dustbin of history, where it belongs.

          Comment


            #75
            Did anyone see his hissy fit this morning? Thought it would have been up on Youtube by now if it was any good.

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by TonyEnglish View Post
              It would be interesting to see how a maths student from today would cope with an A Level paper from 20 or 30 years ago. That would be a good test.
              No it wouldn't. Curricula don't just get reduced, they change as well... things are added as well as removed. Plus of course, the way questions are presented and the 'syntax' used in maths go through 'fashions'. I've seen easy questions on old papers as a school-kid that made no sense until it was explained that f:->x meant f(x) or whatever...
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by bekarovka View Post
                For the record, I can't wait until next June when hopefully we are going to see the labour party consigned to the dustbin of history, where it belongs.
                Because obviously losing an election means the party has to disappear completely. It seems these days people are ever less prepared to give anyone time to prove themselves - football managers sacked after a few games, politicians go from hero->devil if a new policy doesn't change the world in a month - so I think we could easily see the governing party flip-flop every election. Everyone's used to voting out the ones they don't like every 5 minutes thanks to stupid reality TV shows.
                Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                Originally posted by vetran
                Urine is quite nourishing

                Comment


                  #78
                  LG Posted : The dumbing down is forcing the top of the food chain to find different ways to distinguish the wheat from the chaf.
                  Which is what the Socialist hates with a passion, because Socialists have a massive inferiority complex, and loathe anyone who is more successful than they are. (Which isn't difficult to be honest)

                  Hence, the socially-engineered agenda to promote mediocrity is based on jealousy, class hate, and ineptitude.

                  When everyone is as educated as everyone else, then there is no lowest common denominator, and thus even Socialists can feel good about themselves.
                  Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

                  C.S. Lewis

                  Comment


                    #79
                    Originally posted by wurzel View Post
                    Did anyone see his hissy fit this morning? Thought it would have been up on Youtube by now if it was any good.
                    It's here:

                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rm48t...layer_embedded

                    Genius.

                    Comment


                      #80
                      I did not believe the election was lost for Labour until today. Tory government from May. Not that it will make any difference.....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X