• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

bicycle tax disc

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    So, an efficient modern car can be exempt from tax due to low emissions. But bikes need to be taxed for the high amount of wear they cause the roads?

    I love how this is being considered as part of a scheme to get more people cycling rather than driving.

    EDIT: a tax stupidity we can't blame Labour for, Cyberman would have some comment about the Scots no doubt.
    Excellent point.

    Comment


      #22
      For what it's worth, the tax-free status of low-polluting cars is one policy I quite like, as is high tax for idiots who drive monstrous 4x4s. Go Labour
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by d000hg View Post
        For what it's worth, the tax-free status of low-polluting cars is one policy I quite like, as is high tax for idiots who drive monstrous 4x4s. Go Labour
        Except

        They aren't "low polluting" at all. It is a cynical piece of politics that doesn't address the actual issues AT ALL. Still it makes self rightous ignoramouses feel smug.

        Comment


          #24
          I can't speak for every model of car, but am pretty sure you can draw a clear trendline on tax Vs emissions.
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by d000hg View Post
            I can't speak for every model of car, but am pretty sure you can draw a clear trendline on tax Vs emissions.
            Incorrect.

            You can draw a line between tax and CO2 emissions as calculated by the government. But, even on current figures, 10% of the CO2 emmisions from each car occur in manufacture, and a further 5% in the process of recycling at the end of it's use (not necessarily viable life). That's on current figures, so we could save loads, in pollution, CO2 and natural resources by cutting back massively on new cars and keeping the ones we have longer - especially since a 10 year old car today used a huge amount of Co2 in manufacturing and is costly in Co2 terms to scrap.

            People driving big 4x4s (especially newer ones) aren't really discouraged by high road and fuel taxes so it's really just a cynical exercise in grabbing cash for the government and allowing people who like to sneer at people in Range Rovers to maintain an illusion that something's being done.

            Oh yes, and zero road tax for electric cars, for example, ignores the Co2 taken in their manufacture and the power generation for their charging, aside from the very nasty effects of the heavy metals and other nasties used in battery technology.

            "pollution" does not equal "emissions" alone.

            I'm not saying we shouldn't be more responsible - just that the government isn't serious about this - they haven't taken the really radical and unpopular steps that they'd need to if they were. They are just playing at it.

            Why don't they tax aviation fuel? How come public transport's so expensive?

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by d000hg View Post
              For what it's worth, the tax-free status of low-polluting cars is one policy I quite like, as is high tax for idiots who drive monstrous 4x4s. Go Labour
              Where does the Lexus Hybrid fit in, that's a large 4x4 but emissions are very low?
              The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

              But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                All bicycles should have number plates. And need a cycling license.
                These lycra louts need sorting out. Except threaded of course.
                Originally posted by conned tractor View Post
                And may I see your license for using them?


                LICENCE FFS

                Comment


                  #28
                  Well, whilst license is the Americanised spelling of licence, what if the OP was American, and therefore expressing in his or her natural language ?

                  If a Brit was to write on an American forum, would you use license or licence, and why ?
                  Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

                  C.S. Lewis

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                    All bicycles should have number plates. And need a cycling license.

                    I feel sorry for them with their car issues. But there is a minority of lycra lous who treat the pavement like they own it and give cyclists a bad name.

                    These lycra louts need sorting out. Except threaded of course.
                    I thank you.

                    Many cyclists that break the rules are doing so because it is safer than following them. Lycra lout might give you a bit of a fright and might hit the occasional pedestrian, but actually it is safer for everyone.

                    Example: more female cyclists are killed and injured at traffic lights than men, even though more men cycle, because women tend to follow the rules and stop for the lights, whereas men tend to jump onto the pavement and over the pedestrian crossing or just run the lights.

                    Also, just for giggles, I'll mention the interesting statistic that people who physically try to stop lycra lout tend to have a poorer than average driving record.
                    Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                    threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Board Game Geek View Post
                      Well, whilst license is the Americanised spelling of licence, what if the OP was American, and therefore expressing in his or her natural language ?

                      If a Brit was to write on an American forum, would you use license or licence, and why ?
                      They aren't.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X