• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

McKinnon to be extradited

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Thank you matey!

    My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

    Comment


      Originally posted by minestrone View Post
      I was simply returning the point to AtW's claim that a mental condition can not be used to explain a criminal act.
      Are you a retard (in a medical sense)?

      I said HIS mental condition (autism) can not be used to completely absolve him from responsibility for the act.

      There is a long legal practice that SOME mental conditions (insanity) can indeed do that, but in this case the alternative punishment often is putting that person into mental institution.

      In some cases like above if person did not realise what he knew may even result in lack of conviction at all, however McKinnon's condition is nowhere near insanity or anything like this.

      Hell, few millions of UK citizens got autism apparently.

      Comment


        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        What I say is that his behavior that I saw in interview and other stuff seems at odds with what wikipedia tells me in one line that autism means.
        FTFY, Dr AtW.
        Best Forum Advisor 2014
        Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
        Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

        Comment


          Originally posted by AtW View Post
          That's fine mate - I say he should take his arguements to USA court where he'd be able to present expert opinion from his doctor under oath, and prosecution will bring their own experts, he is actually trying to avoid this very actively, my guess is that among other things his medical arguement won't hold much water in court.

          Let's say he killed someone in this country, would he then be allowed to get away with it just because he has autism? Maybe he could argue a reduction in sentence, something that I have no doubt he could have done in USA if he went there, pleaded guilty, brought up this medical "evidence", he'd be home long time ago, though with criminal conviction, he wanted to get away with it though, which is precisely why he should now be extradited.
          Sorry, I didn't realise that it was a murder charge he was up on.
          Best Forum Advisor 2014
          Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
          Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

          Comment


            Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
            FTFY, Dr AtW.
            If you want to get it fixed to correct version then go and literally fix it. I don't believe everything I read in Wikipedia, but that definition seems to be pretty close to what others are saying, if it is incorrect then please provide a better link to support your view.

            If you don't have it then FAQ ***, seriously!

            Comment


              Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
              Sorry, I didn't realise that it was a murder charge he was up on.
              He has been charged with criminal actions, it is not murder charge, but criminal nevertheless.

              Comment


                Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                I was simply returning the point to AtW's claim that a mental condition can not be used to explain a criminal act.
                Then you can have that point

                McKinnon is fully entitled to argue the case that his condition explains his actions. The jury can decide to acquit him on that basis, and even if convicted, a judge might take that into account when sentancing.

                But I think his supporters are placing far too much emphasis on it - suggesting he should basically get a free pass.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  In the end it does not alter situation one bit - if he has got medical condition then he should be able to reduce his sentence, maybe not in USA, in which case he should have considered that way before he did what he did, in fact it is important to extradite him now with maximum publicity so that it hopefully will prevent others from getting into such problems. And if not then fine - they'd have nobody to blame but themselves.
                  Isn't that the whole point, though? His illness meant that he could not consider beforehand anything that he allegedly did.
                  Best Forum Advisor 2014
                  Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                  Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by centurian View Post
                    But I think his supporters are placing far too much emphasis on it - suggesting he should basically get a free pass.
                    Without independent public scrutiny of his defence - doctors can misdiagnose cancer one way or another, who can be certain his doctor got his condition right in the first place?

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by AtW View Post
                      It's simple really - bring him to court, listen to all sides, make decision. It's not like he is being extradited to backwards country with no indepdenent justice system. He also does not face death penalty, as I said - he should have been on the first plane out as soon as he publicly admitted he committed one or more of the crimes he is accused of.

                      I don't know if he gets finally extradited - but if it happens, then 99% he'd plead guilty there very quickly.
                      Some would consider that facing a possible sentence of 70 years would equate to a death sentence.
                      Best Forum Advisor 2014
                      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X