Originally posted by DSW
View Post
1. It is politically motivated; therefore measuring benefits is futile so decision making is poor.
2. It is a programme intended to save money; therefore senior management do not know where to authorise expenditure.
3. It is too big; they are trying to joining together systems owned by bodies that exist at different positions in the hierarchy so the sheer number of stakeholders and their relative levels of authority prevents correct decision making.
4. The NHS believes it is 'a special case' and that good practice used by the rest of the project and programme management industry does not apply.
The very, very short answer is: it is too big.
I can do you 20,000 words on why it has been a failure since 2003 if you wish.
Comment