• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Sainsbury IT back in house

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Sainsbury IT back in house

    http://services.silicon.com/itoutsou...9153723,00.htm

    Sainsbury's is ending its 10-year outsourcing contract with Accenture three years early and bringing its IT operations back in house over the next six to 12 months.

    The retailer said that, as part of its plans to revive its fortunes, its IT focus has changed and now "is the right time to rebuild expertise back in-house".

    It said detailed plans are now being drawn up for the migration of the IT services and future development needs from Accenture to Sainsbury's.

    A Sainsbury's spokeswoman told silicon.com: "Everything will be back in house in the next six to 12 months. We said back in October last year that we would be reviewing the contract with Accenture. The decision has been made that was announced today."

    The retailer signed the 10-year contract with Accenture in November 2000, hoping to save about £35m per year on its previous £200m per year IT spend.

    Key IT development will continue as planned, the retailer said. It said the priority throughout the migration period will be to make sure customers and staff are unaffected by the change, particularly through the Christmas and Easter trading periods.

    The retailer said in a statement: "During this period all Sainsbury's IT systems will remain fully operational and there will be no change in the IT service provided."

    Around 700 staff at Accenture work on Sainsbury's IT systems but the retailer could not say how many will transfer back.

    Sainsbury's said it will make future cost savings so that the exit costs "are expected to pay back in the short term".

    Douglas Hayward, senior analyst at researcher Ovum, said that the problems with the deal show what can go wrong in any outsourcing relationship.

    He said in a research note: "The problems included poor decision-making by Sainsbury executives, weak outsourcing governance, political in-fighting at the retailer and a risky 'big-bang' approach that made too many assumptions and took too many risks.

    "It's a warning that business benefits don't necessarily follow from IT infrastructure renewal unless the business itself is well run and the two sides are properly connected. New IT infrastructure can't compensate for poor business management. In that sense, Sainsbury shows us the limits of transformational outsourcing."


    Oh dear, another outsourcing deal fails. I wonder if they need some highly skilled and paid IT contractors to help with the transition?

    #2
    Two UK universities are in talks with an IT industry body about launching a new specialist MBA course in outsourcing from next year in an attempt to reduce the risk of failed contracts.
    This is the answer.
    I'm alright Jack

    Comment


      #3
      lol

      If Accenture can't do it what hope does India have ??

      Comment


        #4
        you have that the wrong way round
        Chico, what time is it?

        Comment


          #5
          If Accenture can't do it what hope does India have ??
          That's not exactly saying very much messiah. It's debatable whether Accenture are any better at all.

          Nevertheless this demonstrates yet again that outsourcing was/is much more of a 'suck it & see' exercise than the sound management decision managers and directors would have everyone believe.

          If technical analysts and operations managers ran their departments in such a way, senior managers and RCs would have cast them out as incompetant long ago.

          Comment


            #6
            Accenture uses Indians quite heavily....

            As with most consultancies, they have the usual 'happy smiley people' who go in and do the sales pitch, then the legions of wet behind the ears drag-and-drop jockeys go in on 800 a day.

            I like the phrase 'near-shoring' - having a 'development center' in Spain etc...
            Eventually there will be 'onshoring' companies - where - would you believe it - you actually employ British people in Britain.
            Last edited by mcquiggd; 28 October 2005, 09:39.
            Vieze Oude Man

            Comment


              #7
              Well we've had off-shoring, then near shoring, I suppose its a matter of time before we have on-shoring.
              I'm alright Jack

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by BlasterBates
                Well we've had off-shoring, then near shoring, I suppose its a matter of time before we have on-shoring.
                Lets not forget insourcing. Worked on one such project two years ago.
                Sola gratia

                Sola fide

                Soli Deo gloria

                Comment


                  #9
                  Accentue

                  Useless b@rstards

                  Send in swarmy slicked back MBA grads to hook client

                  Swamp client with paperwork

                  Spend millions to produce a spec which is a about as long as the bible and possibly as ambiguous.

                  Screw up whole project intentially and coin it on extensions

                  When after the extension it turns out that millions have been spent producing somethin that the client didnt want, the project get canned

                  Blame clients for f3ckups

                  GOTO Send in swarmy slicked back MBA grads to hook client
                  There are no evil thoughts except one: the refusal to think

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by sunnysan
                    Useless b@rstards

                    Send in swarmy slicked back MBA grads to hook client

                    Swamp client with paperwork

                    Spend millions to produce a spec which is a about as long as the bible and possibly as ambiguous.

                    Screw up whole project intentially and coin it on extensions

                    When after the extension it turns out that millions have been spent producing somethin that the client didnt want, the project get canned

                    Blame clients for f3ckups

                    GOTO Send in swarmy slicked back MBA grads to hook client
                    So who's the idiot there, Accenture or the client.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X