Geert Wilders in Denmark: Deporting millions of Muslims may be necessary

[Le Rosbif]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...n-nick-griffin


HTH

Now isn't it time you toodled off and joined your bum chum CyberCretin for some snails

ONE link...

WHICH DOES NOT MENTION VETERANS

[Le Rosbif]

I get it...

You've just escaped from the wonderful world of the care bears right?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Care_Bears

[sasguru]

ONE link...

very relevant link.

Unlike you.

HTH.

Anyway off home now. Its been fun totally destroying what little argument your puny mind could come up with. But not very challenging.

[Numpty]

What proportion of war veterans have joined the BNP?

"So far the party has at least three Royal Air Force WWII veterans, including at least one Spitfire Battle of Britain pilot, several Royal Navy veterans (including some who took part in the Dunkirk, Tirpitz and Atlantic Convoy campaigns) and a good sprinkling of D-Day veterans."

Let's say 3 + 6 + 9 = 18. Of the millions of WWII veterans, how do we find out how many are still alive? Shall we say a hundred thousand? Would 0.02% do as an estimate of the proportion of war veterans?

[Le Rosbif]

very relevant link.

Unlike you.

HTH.

Anyway off home now. Its been fun totally destroying what little argument your puny mind could come up with. But not very challenging.

Was boring to note that appart calling people who disagree with you "Fascists and Nazis" and spiting insults at them, you don't have anything valid to oppose to well constructed arguments.

I hope your breed is rapidly disappearing in the UK, or your country is properly fooked.

[Board Game Geek]

What a truly horrible, vile, nasty and spiteful thread of poison this has become.

[RichardCranium]

What a truly horrible, vile, nasty and spiteful thread of poison this has become.

The horrible, vile, nasty and spite started about here.

[BrilloPad]

What a truly horrible, vile, nasty and spiteful thread of poison this has become.

Quite standard cuk really.

[Cyberman]

You bastard.

I just spent 5 mins looking for that and was about to post a link ...

Though yours is in colour ...

Surely you only had to look in the mirror.

[Cyberman]

"Ijtihad" is the term (part) of sharia that describes the process of making a legal decision by independent interpretation of the legal sources (Quran and Sunnah - sayings of the prophet). So when we talk about sharia, there is no such thing as a "rule book" with set laws. Learned muslims (i.e. those that have studied and understand the sources in depth) are responsible for interpreting the sources to define the laws. The problem is that since the 10th century the process of "Ijtihad" has not really been happening.

If the sources were to be studied today and a new set of laws/rulings produced, they may be very different. The danger is that one view of sharia is being propagated by the hardliners, Taliban type people. But if you were to ask muslims in the west if they want to live under those rules - 99% will say no. In fact, even muslims in Pakistan don't want to live under the sharia the Taliban wants to bring in. I was there 3 weeks back and over 99% of people I spoke to want the Taliban to just go..

So the growth of number of muslims in the west, does not necessarily mean that they will all vote for "sharia" or an Islamic party. I'm a muslim, and I wouldn't vote for sharia....

There should not be any Sharia in the West at all. Labour have bent over backwards to accommodate these people when it is OUR country and they should abide by our laws, not theirs. You simply cannot run a country with two sets of laws for different religions and with women being second-class as muslims and equal as Christians.
We allow polygamous marriages for muslims but if we Christians did it we would be locked up for bigamy.