Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
While theft might be proven, I think there's reasonable doubt as to whether the cat actually killed the Koi. The cat in question is 17 years old, blind in one eye, deaf in one ear, walks with a limp and has a deteriorated kidney function, thus lowering his energy levels to the point that he sleeps 23 hours a day. It is reasonable to suggest that the carp was actually lying dead in the water and the cat simply saw it's lifeless corpse as a convenient lunch. Of course, the Koi would not have been long dead as cats won't eat rotten flesh if they know there's some parma ham in the fridge, but I don't think that murder or manslaughter can be proven here.
Where's the 'twin white tigers on gold chains' option?
Threaded.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
It's somewhat akin to a cruel form of long term torture, because you are creating an unnatural dependency within the animal, that did not previously exist.
You might say that it's a beneficial Master and Slave relationship, in that both sides obtain what they from it.
The Master gains companionship, sometimes pride, joy and happiness.
The Slave gains food, companionship of sorts, hopefully safety and protection.
However you dress it up, the bottom line is that it is still a Master & Slave relationship, and the element of subjugation and dominion is ever present.
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
It's somewhat akin to a cruel form of long term torture, because you are creating an unnatural dependency within the animal, that did not previously exist.
You might say that it's a beneficial Master and Slave relationship, in that both sides obtain what they from it.
The Master gains companionship, sometimes pride, joy and happiness.
The Slave gains food, companionship of sorts, hopefully safety and protection.
However you dress it up, the bottom line is that it is still a Master & Slave relationship, and the element of subjugation and dominion is ever present.
I thought it was just me who thought like that. It goes beyond master slave to mental conditioning and grooming for domestic animals though I think cats are in charge of their own relationships.
NOTE: Master slave scenarios can be fun for both whethe voluntary or not.
I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time
It's somewhat akin to a cruel form of long term torture, because you are creating an unnatural dependency within the animal, that did not previously exist.
You might say that it's a beneficial Master and Slave relationship, in that both sides obtain what they from it.
The Master gains companionship, sometimes pride, joy and happiness.
The Slave gains food, companionship of sorts, hopefully safety and protection.
However you dress it up, the bottom line is that it is still a Master & Slave relationship, and the element of subjugation and dominion is ever present.
Hmmmm. Food for thought, but it seems that cats were already present in ancient Egyptian society, and in fact any ancient society that had grown beyond hunter gatherer toward agriculture. They seem to have gravitated towards humans a very long time ago, perhaps because there's lots of food around people's homes, so arguably their presence was voluntary; they obviously realised that sitting in front of a human looking cute was a good way to get an easy and tasty meal. Their descendants among modern domestic cats have grown to be well adapted to that relationship. Anyway, they can leave if they want to, but most cats come back home in the evenings, perhaps just because they don't know better. I think it's stretching it to call that cruelty though.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Comment