• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

IT jobs 'lost to cheap labour' -

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #81
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2...s-ibm-business

    What they are trying to promote for those laid off in the USA is a move to the countries where the jobs are going yet you will only get the local going salary.

    "IBM workers in India earn an average $5,000 a year, compared with between $50,000 and $80,000 for a similar job in the US."


    That's my point. They then charge the customer the same and pocket the difference. It goes on because western conmen know that most of the Indian techies can't just get on a plane and move to the US or Europe because of visa regulations, as they undoubtedly would if they could. Even those that do manage to come here are paid a lot less than westerners, and are often brought in on 'work experience projects' which allow their employer to get round local regulations.
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #82
      Its all explained in this strangely unpopular thread
      Hard Brexit now!
      #prayfornodeal

      Comment


        #83
        Originally posted by sasguru View Post
        I think you're wrong. Like it or not, and I'm not really keen on too much regulation, voters all over the world's democracies (I use the word loosely) are so angry about the mess in the financial system and bonusses that look more like embezzlement that they're demanding that governments take a stronger line in regulating markets and the activities of multinationals. Rightly or wrongly, the age of liberalisation has come to an end, and it's time to figure out how to make money in a more regulated economy.
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #84
          Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
          If the skilled work force is unemployed who is going to be able to afford those first world prices?


          This has been my mantra for quite some time.
          Snap. I have already seen this in action with former colleagues in the US.

          And where I live at the moment, rents have been substantially inflated over the last couple of years by an influx of much cheapness labour. Thing is, they are on reasonably good money, so the only cheapness I can see is long term, such as pensions etc. That or there is the political will...
          Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

          Comment


            #85
            Originally posted by Sysman View Post
            Snap. I have already seen this in action with former colleagues in the US.

            And where I live at the moment, rents have been substantially inflated over the last couple of years by an influx of much cheapness labour. Thing is, they are on reasonably good money, so the only cheapness I can see is long term, such as pensions etc. That or there is the political will...
            Indeed. If there's no middle class there's no-one left to buy the cars, fridges, TVs, holidays and gadgets that multinationals sell. Nobody except a few very rich people, but they aren't going to buy 500 fridges each or 2000 Astras each week.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #86
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              I think you're wrong. Like it or not, and I'm not really keen on too much regulation, voters all over the world's democracies (I use the word loosely) are so angry about the mess in the financial system and bonusses that look more like embezzlement that they're demanding that governments take a stronger line in regulating markets and the activities of multinationals. Rightly or wrongly, the age of liberalisation has come to an end, and it's time to figure out how to make money in a more regulated economy.
              Nah. Temporary blip. Some of the US banks will be able to repay their TARP money this month so they the govt will have no hold on them.
              Then if they find onerous regulation in the US or Britain there'll be somewhere like say, Vietnam, who won't have the regs and they'll relocate there.
              This will only speed the process.
              Hard Brexit now!
              #prayfornodeal

              Comment


                #87
                Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                Indeed. If there's no middle class there's no-one left to buy the cars, fridges, TVs, holidays and gadgets that multinationals sell. Nobody except a few very rich people, but they aren't going to buy 500 fridges each or 2000 Astras each week.
                With the demographics in Europe, multi-nats know they are on to a loser. In India 75% of the pop are under 25 with a rising income. Now there's a market. If you had no nationalist thoughts where would you rather be?

                Think like a CEO, man, FFS!
                Hard Brexit now!
                #prayfornodeal

                Comment


                  #88
                  Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                  Nah. Temporary blip. Some of the US banks will be able to repay their TARP money this month so they the govt will have no hold on them.
                  Then if they find onerous regulation in the US or Britain there'll be somewhere like say, Vietnam, who won't have the regs and they'll relocate there.
                  This will only speed the process.
                  Just as they moved to Ireland and bankrupted the place? I think that even the most idiotic of third world dictators have seen the damage and will leave well alone.

                  Anyway, arguably it would be good riddance. We might then start building real companies making real stuff. Oh no, sorry, media studies people don't know how to do that.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #89
                    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
                    With the demographics in Europe, multi-nats know they are on to a loser. In India 75% of the pop are under 25 with a rising income. Now there's a market. If you had no nationalist thoughts where would you rather be?

                    Think like a CEO, man, FFS!
                    Newly rich people buy European goods and always have because the new rich want to emulate old money. Hence they buy European brand names. Europe will be OK as long as it competes on quality and image. Try to compete on price and we're dead.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #90
                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      Newly rich people buy European goods and always have because the new rich want to emulate old money. Hence they buy European brand names. Europe will be OK as long as it competes on quality and image. Try to compete on price and we're dead.
                      Does that include UK.....I dont think so...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X