• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

A victory for commonsense !!!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    I don't agree and there are many instances of death through ecstacy. Kids need protecting sometimes and this is one of those occasions IMO.
    Also, there is the issue of 'pathway' drugs whereby one lower level drug leads to trying higher level. The best thing is just not to go there.
    Some kind of evidence to back up your pointless bleatings would be appreciated. Anything with ".dailymail." in the URL does not count.
    "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "


    Thomas Jefferson

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
      Bollocks. Compared to deaths caused by tobacco and alcohol they pale into a minority so small it's insignificant.
      I understand how you chose your moniker now DS
      "Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "


      Thomas Jefferson

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
        Bollocks. Compared to deaths caused by tobacco and alcohol they pale into a minority so small it's insignificant.

        Ban alcohol and tobacco then. I have no problem with that, and we will all be healthier for it, but don't use them as an excuse to add further dangers to our health and thus burdens to the taxpayer through increased reliance on the NHS.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
          Bollocks. Compared to deaths caused by tobacco and alcohol they pale into a minority so small it's insignificant.
          Are you talking absolute numbers or percentages here?
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
            Bollocks. Compared to deaths caused by tobacco and alcohol they pale into a minority so small it's insignificant.
            If it's just one who happens to be a family member of mine then it's significant.

            Comment

            Working...
            X