Originally posted by DiscoStu
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: A victory for commonsense !!!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "A victory for commonsense !!!"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by DiscoStu View PostBollocks. Compared to deaths caused by tobacco and alcohol they pale into a minority so small it's insignificant.
Ban alcohol and tobacco then. I have no problem with that, and we will all be healthier for it, but don't use them as an excuse to add further dangers to our health and thus burdens to the taxpayer through increased reliance on the NHS.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cyberman View PostI don't agree and there are many instances of death through ecstacy. Kids need protecting sometimes and this is one of those occasions IMO.
Also, there is the issue of 'pathway' drugs whereby one lower level drug leads to trying higher level. The best thing is just not to go there.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cyberman View PostI don't agree and there are many instances of death through ecstacy. Kids need protecting sometimes and this is one of those occasions IMO.
Also, there is the issue of 'pathway' drugs whereby one lower level drug leads to trying higher level. The best thing is just not to go there.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gingerjedi View PostDo you put a fork through footballs that stray into your garden before you throw them back?
It's just kids having a good time.
I don't agree and there are many instances of death through ecstacy. Kids need protecting sometimes and this is one of those occasions IMO.
Also, there is the issue of 'pathway' drugs whereby one lower level drug leads to trying higher level. The best thing is just not to go there.
Leave a comment:
-
I have to say the decision doesn't surprise me in the least. The government has a habit of comissioning expert reports and then ignoring them completely, especially when it comes to drug classification.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cyberman View Post... well at least I am ecstatic !!!!!!
It's just kids having a good time.
Leave a comment:
-
Based on number of deaths & general cost to the economy Alcohol would be a Class B drug.
By the same measures, Ecstasy barely counts as a C Class.
The only reason Daily Mail readers give a toss about this is the (misguided) Leah Betts campaign.
Leave a comment:
-
commonsense?
A total disregard of the expert evidence provided.
A continued implementation of an ideology based on bigotry, not reason.
A government completely out of step with the public.
Leave a comment:
-
A victory for commonsense !!!
Just announced on the news that ecstacy will not be downgraded !!!!!!
They must have done a poll on it !!!!Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Leave a comment: