Money Well Spent?

[John Galt]

Lotto rapist protected by taxpayers

The rapist who won £7 million on the lotto is being protected by the Home Office at a cost of thousands

Can you honestly think of a better way for Bliar to be spending your taxes?

[The Late, Great JC]

Lotto rapist protected by taxpayers

The rapist who won £7 million on the lotto is being protected by the Home Office at a cost of thousands

Can you honestly think of a better way for Bliar to be spending your taxes?

The Government would have had to protect him whether or not he'd won the money...

[John Galt]

The only reason he needs protection is because his win was so widely publicised - as was his crime. Considering the crimes I'd scrap the protection, save the tax payer thousands and then scrape up the squiddgey bits after Joe Public had finished with him

[AlfredJPruffock]

Lotto rapist protected by taxpayers

The rapist who won £7 million on the lotto is being protected by the Home Office at a cost of thousands

Can you honestly think of a better way for Bliar to be spending your taxes?

How about sqaundering squillions on a futile and illegal War ... ???

[The Late, Great JC]

How about sqaundering squillions on a futile and illegal War ... ???

Sounds like a good idea, you start...

[n5gooner]

Sounds like a good idea, you start...

I RogerRabit has......

[steve'O]

Has he got Chemical Weapons? Or does he just swear a lot?

[AlfredJPruffock]

Sounds like a good idea, you start...

Sounds almost like one of those awful HR interviews, where the ask you seming banal but actually loaded questions, ie If you could be a car , which model would you be ?

You know the kind of guff.

So how about, If you could wage war on a country ...which would it be ?

Personally I would wage war on Finland, I need hardly explain why.

[xoggoth]

I see in the DT that that whatesrname woman, girlfriend of Ian Brady, costs us £700,000 a year.

[Joe Bloggs]

I see in the DT that that whatesrname woman, girlfriend of Ian Brady, costs us £700,000 a year.

Wouldn't it be better then, from a taxpayers point of view, to simply ask all potential criminals to identify themselves, and then offer to set up a trust fund for them providing say (lets be fair) £100k per year as long as they don't commit any criminal acts.

It would be cheaper in the long run and would also avoid all the legal costs, policing, compensation to victims etc.

Indeed the entire criminal processing system, police, investigators, courts, judges, prisons and all the costs going into it could be removed in one stroke... it would save us billions.