Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Thanks to New Lie's new laws on sentences, she will only serve 4 years. In 1996 she would probably have served between 5 and 6 years!! Tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime!!
Liam Fox didn't have any answers last night, it's no good moaning about people not serving the full sentence if the prisons are full.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
It's disgusting - the b*tch should be frolicking burned alive.
I hope she gets torn a new one inside.
I'm shocked Sally, that sounds very unforgiving of you! I thought you were all for children being drugged up
The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”
Liam Fox didn't have any answers last night, it's no good moaning about people not serving the full sentence if the prisons are full.
Labour have had 12 years to build new prisons and just as long to introduce tougher sentences that would actually reduce the prison population by having proper deterrents !!
Labour have had 12 years to build new prisons and just as long to introduce tougher sentences that would actually reduce the prison population by having proper deterrents !!
So you're in favour of increasing public spending now? Make your mind up.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
I'm shocked Sally, that sounds very unforgiving of you! I thought you were all for children being drugged up
Through their own choice, yes
But a mother forcing them (was it tomazapan?) on a kid to keep her quiet, and locking/chaining her up for weeks...and that's what we KNOW of....ah honestly, I'm normally a bit of a lefty liberal whern it comes to punishment and stuff, but I would personally beat that bitch senseless and not bat an eye.
I'm actually really angry now just thinking about it.
So you're in favour of increasing public spending now? Make your mind up.
He's in favour of low interest rates, continuation of a housing bubble
Spending cuts, but building more prisons and taxpayer borrowing to failed businesses hurt by the collapse of the housing bubble
If that makes sense
The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”
Comment