• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Karen Matthews gets 8 years"

Collapse

  • Pickle2
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    How many prisons could they have built with the 12.5 Billion wasted on that VAT cut!!
    From google search: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...nsandprobation

    "In the UK it is estimated that each new prison place costs £119,000 and that the annual average cost for each prisoner exceeds £40,000."

    So I reckon to build a prison and provide funding 50 years of use, with 12.5 billion, we could of provided one or more prisons to house a total of 5,700 inmates.

    So once youve banged up the first 5,700 drug addled idiots, what next?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Hahaha. Payphones are ever so slightly different to mobile phones. They really should not be allowed to use mobile phones at all IMO !! Prisons should be a punishment but that seems to have been forgotten under Labour. Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime !!
    Perhaps it's cheaper to let low security prisoners use their own mobile than to install payphones, which aren't cheap these days.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
    (was it tomazapan?)
    Is that a mix of temazepam and tomato ketchup?


    You are devious...

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    That's right, but prisoners had access to payphones. Now they might have mobile phones, although I wouldn't say that's a good idea for serious criminals.

    Hahaha. Payphones are ever so slightly different to mobile phones. They really should not be allowed to use mobile phones at all IMO !! Prisons should be a punishment but that seems to have been forgotten under Labour. Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime !!

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    I somehow don't think mobile phones were in widespread usage prior to 1997. Some perhaps, but certainly not many.
    That's right, but prisoners had access to payphones. Now they might have mobile phones, although I wouldn't say that's a good idea for serious criminals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    I don't think conjugal visits are allowed in British prisons. And of course prisoners had TVs and access to phones during the conservative government too.

    I somehow don't think mobile phones were in widespread usage prior to 1997. Some perhaps, but certainly not many.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.

    They must have been pretty paralytic though.
    Well, she will be drinking from the furry cup for the next few years

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    As an aside, how did 5 different men get drunk enough to do her in the first place?
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.

    They must have been pretty paralytic though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    How many prisons could they have built with the 12.5 Billion wasted on that VAT cut!! I firmly believe that tougher sentences would actually reduce the prison population, so public spending may not be necessary. Labour policy requires more prisons because of their mollycoddling of prisoners with TVs, mobile phones, conjugal rights etc.
    I don't think conjugal visits are allowed in British prisons. And of course prisoners had TVs and access to phones during the conservative government too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    until she breeds some new ones.
    I would hope she won't be allowed to keep them if she does,

    As an aside, how did 5 different men get drunk enough to do her in the first place?

    As another aside, what really upsets me about this is that if it wasn't for the ludricous kidnap plot poor Shannon and others would have carried on been abused.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
    So you're in favour of increasing public spending now? Make your mind up.

    How many prisons could they have built with the 12.5 Billion wasted on that VAT cut!! I firmly believe that tougher sentences would actually reduce the prison population, so public spending may not be necessary. Labour policy requires more prisons because of their mollycoddling of prisoners with TVs, mobile phones, conjugal rights etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
    She'll have naff all income as the kids won't be given back to her.
    until she breeds some new ones.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gibbon
    replied
    Actually I think she should get less, she will be relatively secure in prison and settle into some sort of routine.

    Her problems will come when she is let out, no one will touch her with a barge pole or the wrong end of a spongia. She will have to live miles away from Dewsbury pretending she's someone else for the rest of her life.

    She'll have naff all income as the kids won't be given back to her.

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
    Through their own choice, yes

    But a mother forcing them (was it tomazapan?) on a kid to keep her quiet, and locking/chaining her up for weeks...and that's what we KNOW of....ah honestly, I'm normally a bit of a lefty liberal whern it comes to punishment and stuff, but I would personally beat that bitch senseless and not bat an eye.
    I'm actually really angry now just thinking about it.
    Be fair, if drugging birds and chaining them to a bed were to be outlawed the jails would be bursting. I , for one, would be looking at a 20 stretch



    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    He's in favour of low interest rates, continuation of a housing bubble
    Spending cuts, but building more prisons and taxpayer borrowing to failed businesses hurt by the collapse of the housing bubble
    ...and locking up Robert Peston.

    I think he's been exposed as a NuLabour crony. Maybe we should call him CyberGordon instead?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X