• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Karen Matthews gets 8 years

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    He's in favour of low interest rates, continuation of a housing bubble
    Spending cuts, but building more prisons and taxpayer borrowing to failed businesses hurt by the collapse of the housing bubble
    ...and locking up Robert Peston.

    I think he's been exposed as a NuLabour crony. Maybe we should call him CyberGordon instead?
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by SallyAnne View Post
      Through their own choice, yes

      But a mother forcing them (was it tomazapan?) on a kid to keep her quiet, and locking/chaining her up for weeks...and that's what we KNOW of....ah honestly, I'm normally a bit of a lefty liberal whern it comes to punishment and stuff, but I would personally beat that bitch senseless and not bat an eye.
      I'm actually really angry now just thinking about it.
      Be fair, if drugging birds and chaining them to a bed were to be outlawed the jails would be bursting. I , for one, would be looking at a 20 stretch



      (\__/)
      (>'.'<)
      ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

      Comment


        #23
        Actually I think she should get less, she will be relatively secure in prison and settle into some sort of routine.

        Her problems will come when she is let out, no one will touch her with a barge pole or the wrong end of a spongia. She will have to live miles away from Dewsbury pretending she's someone else for the rest of her life.

        She'll have naff all income as the kids won't be given back to her.
        But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
          She'll have naff all income as the kids won't be given back to her.
          until she breeds some new ones.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
            So you're in favour of increasing public spending now? Make your mind up.

            How many prisons could they have built with the 12.5 Billion wasted on that VAT cut!! I firmly believe that tougher sentences would actually reduce the prison population, so public spending may not be necessary. Labour policy requires more prisons because of their mollycoddling of prisoners with TVs, mobile phones, conjugal rights etc.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              until she breeds some new ones.
              I would hope she won't be allowed to keep them if she does,

              As an aside, how did 5 different men get drunk enough to do her in the first place?

              As another aside, what really upsets me about this is that if it wasn't for the ludricous kidnap plot poor Shannon and others would have carried on been abused.
              But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
                How many prisons could they have built with the 12.5 Billion wasted on that VAT cut!! I firmly believe that tougher sentences would actually reduce the prison population, so public spending may not be necessary. Labour policy requires more prisons because of their mollycoddling of prisoners with TVs, mobile phones, conjugal rights etc.
                I don't think conjugal visits are allowed in British prisons. And of course prisoners had TVs and access to phones during the conservative government too.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
                  As an aside, how did 5 different men get drunk enough to do her in the first place?
                  Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.

                  They must have been pretty paralytic though.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.

                    They must have been pretty paralytic though.
                    Well, she will be drinking from the furry cup for the next few years
                    (\__/)
                    (>'.'<)
                    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      I don't think conjugal visits are allowed in British prisons. And of course prisoners had TVs and access to phones during the conservative government too.

                      I somehow don't think mobile phones were in widespread usage prior to 1997. Some perhaps, but certainly not many.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X