• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

KP Quits

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    KP Quits

    On his way this morning according to Sky.

    #2
    Marvellous, now Strauss will be made captain and have to be picked for the one-dayers, even though he's no good at them
    ǝןqqıʍ

    Comment


      #3
      If the captain chooses the coach, then it sets a dangerous precedent.

      But, as Stu points out, Strauss would get the job and need to be added to the ODI squad, even though he's no good. And who does the Twenty20 job?

      Unless they move back to having a split captaincy, which doesn't work particularly well anyway (for England, at least). And (again) who could they have as ODI captain - Collingwood? Flintoff?

      Bring back Vaughan to solve all the problems...
      Best Forum Advisor 2014
      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

      Comment


        #4
        But Vaughan's crap at ODI's too. I wonder if Collingwood would be up for it for both teams?
        ǝןqqıʍ

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
          But Vaughan's crap at ODI's too. I wonder if Collingwood would be up for it for both teams?
          Why does anyone give a toss about ODIs and Twenty20? Test matches are what count, and more specifically the Ashes.
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by DiscoStu View Post
            But Vaughan's crap at ODI's too. I wonder if Collingwood would be up for it for both teams?
            Collingwood quit when his form was too bad, and also because he couldn't work with Moores.

            Vaughan quit because his form was too bad, and because he couldn't work with Moores.

            Petersen may go because he can't work with Moores.

            I can almost see some kind of trend emerging here, but it's a little vague still....

            Moores was good at the academy, but not good enough for the England job. Should have gone to Tom Moody when we had the chance, but he's out of the way now. Graeme Ford is a good shout, but not too well thought of within the ECB. Ashley Giles as a stop-gap (no coaching experience) while they try to get the right man in for the home series would be my choice, I think.

            Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
            Why does anyone give a toss about ODIs and Twenty20?
            Because that's where all the money is.
            Best Forum Advisor 2014
            Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
            Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              Why does anyone give a toss about ODIs and Twenty20? Test matches are what count, and more specifically the Ashes.
              Because, unfortunately, it's where a large chunk of the ECB's income is derived from.
              ǝןqqıʍ

              Comment


                #8
                Moores' international cricket experience before he got this job was what, exactly? No wonder players and skippers seem to have no faith in him.

                Why does England have an amazing capacity to employ idiots to run its sports? Cricket, football, rugby, tennis, athletics, hockey....the list goes on.
                Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                Comment


                  #9
                  I think that the Cricket World Cup should be 20/20 for the first group stage, then ODI format for the knockout phase until the final, which should be a 5 day test.

                  That would reveal the true world champions, who have mastered all the formats of the game, and don't just focus on one bit.
                  When money ceases to be the tool by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of men. Blood, whips and guns--or dollars. Take your choice - Ayn Rand, Atlas.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Cricket is a game played over 5 days. End of.

                    Everything is running round in pyjamas.

                    IMHO of course.
                    Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X