Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Before Timberwolf see's this.. (and having checked after posting) i'll agree with you now
Using the figures in the second link; height 2,500 m and distance to cover 35,000 m, means a glide ratio of 1 in 14. Just about feasible with a hang glider I'd have thought. A 747 too. And a car (on sloping ground). His device doesn't have the finesse of a hang-glider though. A sailpane (finess of 60) could glide 4 times that distance from that height.
From 8,200 feet ability to glide 23 miles? I don't think so!
He could go on indefinitely if he used a paraglide wing, someone must have invented a deployable one by now?
Do you get thermals over the sea??
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
Comment