• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Russian ethnic cleansing of Georgians

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by sappatz View Post
    the BBC war propaganda machine is working in full swing about Georgia.

    The problem is that Georgia was encouraged by Western governments into crushing Ossetia. and the Russian reaction is more than legitimate in those circumstances

    Russia never does anything legitimate.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by sappatz View Post
      the BBC war propaganda machine is working in full swing about Georgia.

      The problem is that Georgia was encouraged by Western governments into crushing Ossetia. and the Russian reaction is more than legitimate in those circumstances
      and another pathetic defensive response by one of Vladimir Putins puppets
      Confusion is a natural state of being

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        It's certainly not legitimate - even by Russian laws. The Russian forces entered territory of different state - Russian laws required President to get sanction (which was given later - backdated) for this, and international law is pretty clear on this - minimum is declaration of war is necessary. Hitler and the Japanese made it more legitimate when they attacked USSR and USA - the laws were never exactly the stopping barrier to Russia, it's just not the way things are done there.

        Ossetia was financed by Russia and regular shelling was done from there - effectively Russia had undeclared war on Georgia for a long time and recently it intencified. Ask yourself how was it possible for so many troops and tanks to move in so quickly? That was possible because they were ready and prepared - just like when Hitler attacked USSR. In fact some facts coming out that indicate that a large group of those forces was already in Ossetia before official war started.

        BBC is very mild on the issue if anything. If you want to know what propaganda is you should watch (if you can understand it) Russian TV. And if you don't then you don't know **** so don't even mention word "propaganda" because you yourself was never subjected to it (unlike me).
        Bombing of FRY = legitimate
        Kosovo independence = legitimate
        Israel attacks Lebanon because of two captured solders = legitimate
        GB invades Falklands = Legitimate
        US invades Iraq = Legitimate
        Metropolitan Police shoot dead man with table leg. = mistake
        Metropolitan Police shoot dead man with rucksack. = mistake
        John Smith (former head of Labour party) = Heart attract in hotel bath
        Dr Kelly cut wrists with no blood = suicide
        BBC uses film footage of Ossetia and labels it footage of Tbilisi = mistake



        "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Paddy View Post
          Bombing of FRY = legitimate
          Kosovo independence = legitimate
          Israel attacks Lebanon because of two captured solders = legitimate
          GB invades Falklands = Legitimate
          US invades Iraq = Legitimate
          Metropolitan Police shoot dead man with table leg. = mistake
          Metropolitan Police shoot dead man with rucksack. = mistake
          John Smith (former head of Labour party) = Heart attract in hotel bath
          Dr Kelly cut wrists with no blood = suicide
          BBC uses film footage of Ossetia and labels it footage of Tbilisi = mistake
          That's all you can dig over a few decades?

          Do you want me to post list of Putins enemies killed or numbers murdered in Chechnya again to see that Russia's actions fit the pattern of evil much better than issues you lumped together above?

          FYI I never thought invasion of Iraq was good idea or even legitimate (formally it might be) - but at least in this case it is was known that Saddam Hussein is not a democratic nice person who treats his people with respect and dignity. Not a justification for invasion but a big difference between what Russia did there.

          Also this Kosovo stuff is totally different - did the West annex it? No. Russia on the other hand effectively annexed those territories - the closest most correct comparison is what Hitler did.

          Also, people who did not agree with Iraq invasion voiced that in public and Blair did not kill them or did not close newspapers who were against him - Putin did all that early on when he levelled Chechnya to the ground.

          West is not perfect, it is not white - a shade of grey perhaps, but when you deal with something seriously close to black one should not complain about lacking perfect white stuff.
          Last edited by AtW; 1 September 2008, 20:47.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Paddy View Post
            Bombing of FRY = legitimate
            Kosovo independence = legitimate
            Israel attacks Lebanon because of two captured solders = legitimate
            GB invades Falklands = Legitimate
            US invades Iraq = Legitimate
            Metropolitan Police shoot dead man with table leg. = mistake
            Metropolitan Police shoot dead man with rucksack. = mistake
            John Smith (former head of Labour party) = Heart attract in hotel bath
            Dr Kelly cut wrists with no blood = suicide
            BBC uses film footage of Ossetia and labels it footage of Tbilisi = mistake


            What's a Heart attract?

            Excellent Journalism Paddy, Why don't you go work as a reporter in Russia. They're running out so there are plenty of vacancies

            Far from being an individual tragedy, the death of Ivan Safronov will be seen by many as part of a grim trend. The Kommersant reporter is at least the 20th Russian journalist to die in suspicious circumstances since 2000, when Vladimir Putin assumed the Russian presidency. Shot, stabbed or poisoned, the journalists have two things in common: no one has been convicted, or in most cases even arrested, after their deaths. And all of them had angered powerful vested interests which appear to suffer little restraint in dealing with their enemies.
            Link
            Confusion is a natural state of being

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Diver View Post
              Excellent Journalism Paddy, Why don't you go work as a reporter in Russia. They're running out so there are plenty of vacancies
              He'd do well there - as long as you support Putin and kiss butt of his mates you will make good money and be allowed to write, do TV etc. Of course to do that one would need to have complete lack of conscience but it ain't a problem Paddy, innit?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by AtW View Post
                He'd do well there - as long as you support Putin and kiss butt of his mates you will make good money and be allowed to write, do TV etc. Of course to do that one would need to have complete lack of conscience but it ain't a problem Paddy, innit?

                AtW, What support for Putin? When did I write that? In fact never. It’s just that you are blind and full of hate and so ignore the facts. Like others who loose an argument you have to resort to flippant remarks that have nothing to do with the subject. You’re your remarks are just like people who say that if you are against the invasion of Iraq you must then be on the side of Sadam.
                "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

                Comment


                  #28
                  Russia

                  Putins argument seem very reasonable and rational, contrarily to the US-UK imperialist bulltulip which is spread to their populace.
                  Will Russia become also a colony of the anglos ?

                  He'd do well there - as long as you support Putin and kiss butt of his mates you will make good money and be allowed to write, do TV etc. Of course to do that one would need to have complete lack of conscience but it ain't a problem Paddy, innit?
                  same in UK and US dont you think ? do you think that when you do a career in journalism, objectivity will bring rewards ?
                  Western double standards are obvious to anyone (note that it has always been so)

                  Comment


                    #29
                    <------Just for Putin and his gang of murderous henchmen.

                    I wonder if he'll have me killed now, like everyone else that has spoken out against him.
                    hundreds of his opponents and critics have mysteriously died in unexplainable accidents and murders.---Strange that, in a so called democracy
                    Confusion is a natural state of being

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Diver View Post
                      <------Just for Putin and his gang of murderous henchmen.

                      I wonder if he'll have me killed now, like everyone else that has spoken out against him.
                      hundreds of his opponents and critics have mysteriously died in unexplainable accidents and murders.---Strange that, in a so called democracy


                      If Diver or myself disappear from this BB, IT WAS PUTIN !!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X