Originally posted by ace00
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Britain vs Russia a message
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Fair point. My own position is that I am suspicious of Russias agenda and that I am extremely worried about the prospect of WW3. The USAs competence in dealing politically with International affairs is also worrying.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone -
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostFair point. My own position is that I am suspicious of Russias agenda and that I am extremely worried about the prospect of WW3. The USAs competence in dealing politically with International affairs is also worrying.
Incompetence
Say what you mean Dodgy.
Americas attitude on international affairs has always been "What's in it for us?"
Iraq for example. How many yank contracting companies have made billions?Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
Here here! Dodgy Agent - you really need to wake up, or you might as well join all the Hill-billies in the US!Originally posted by Likely View PostIf there is a major conflict aka WWW III ( now that is a good Doom thread ) it will be between the big ones ie. US vs Russia etc , NATO members like Romania , Poland and most smaller NATO members will definitely try to preserve neutrality. For one they could never defend against attack from Russia ( they simply don't have the technology) , secondly their armies are so insignificant they can hardly make a difference and they would remain neutral.
PS: WWW III = World Wide War III
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Diver View Post
Incompetence
Say what you mean Dodgy.
Americas attitude on international affairs has always been "What's in it for us?"
Iraq for example. How many yank contracting companies have made billions?
"everyone's"
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Agreed. it's just that USers go that little step furtherOriginally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
"everyone's"Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
Originally posted by Diver View Post
Incompetence
Say what you mean Dodgy.
Americas attitude on international affairs has always been "What's in it for us?"
Iraq for example. How many yank contracting companies have made billions?
So what did they want out of Vietnam ?Comment
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ContainmentOriginally posted by Cyberman View PostSo what did they want out of Vietnam ?"I hope Celtic realise that, if their team is good enough, they will win. If they're not good enough, they'll not win - and they can't look at anybody else, whether it is referees or any other influence." - Walter Smith
On them! On them! They fail!Comment
-
More so than Hitler?Originally posted by Diver View PostAgreed. it's just that USers go that little step further
I suppose with people like you that even if the Russians teamed up with Al Quaeda and nuked Paris it would all be the Americans fault. Quite happy that thanks to the Americans Western Europe was not rolled over by the Russians after the 2nd world war, quite happy to enjoy peace and prosperity in Europe thanks to the Americans in the last 50 years, yet anything that goes wrong anywhere, even the Russians invading Georgia is blamed on the Americans.
I didnt think Neville Chamberlin had it in him to spawn grandchildren , but he clearly did.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Got to demote you to armchair private, in charge of cleaning the latrines for that one.Originally posted by Cyberman View PostSo what did they want out of Vietnam ?Bored.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Comment