I may be about to start a new contract, indication is it is 6 months but I'm concerned there might not be 6 months worth of work in there. Is it acceptable to put a clause in the contract stating that the full 6 months will be payable should the project finish early? Or something to this effect? I'm willing to take it for the money being offered, but not if 70% through they close the project...?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Short term contract - is this clause acceptable?
Collapse
X
-
Short term contract - is this clause acceptable?
The cycle of life: born > learn > work > learn > dead. -
In return do you accept 8 months work for 6 months pay? If so, then it may fly as a fixed price contract bid. Otherwise forget it.
Usual disclaimers apply etc........Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k. -
You could ask for a contract based on a specific deliverable or stages of deliverables - bit like a builder who builds a conservatory, but I would guess you are in the game of supplying a service - if the client has no further need for said service he won't want to pay you - thats why he's using a contractor and not a permie.Cenedl heb iaith, cenedl heb galon
Comment
-
Doing something like that will land you squarely in IR35 territory. An obligation for the client to pay you even when there is no work makes you look a lot like a permie.Originally posted by chris79 View PostI may be about to start a new contract, indication is it is 6 months but I'm concerned there might not be 6 months worth of work in there. Is it acceptable to put a clause in the contract stating that the full 6 months will be payable should the project finish early? Or something to this effect? I'm willing to take it for the money being offered, but not if 70% through they close the project...?
*Hint* If the contract is for 6 months, and the client thinks it will take six months then it is your duty as a contractor to meet their expectations *hint*"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Work at a more leisurely pace?Originally posted by chris79 View PostI'm concerned there might not be 6 months worth of work in there.Comment
-
Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.Comment
-
over engineer thenOriginally posted by Xenophon View PostI'd never do that.

Coffee's for closersComment
-
Originally posted by Spacecadet View Postover engineer then
Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.Comment
-
FWIW, my experience of doing 6 months work in 4 months can reward you with another 6 months contract that runs for 7 months the year after. So everyone involved is a winner. It's happened to me twice with two clients.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Hah cheers for the replies guys.. interesting comments. Yeah I guess it's in my best interests to 'project manage' the situation to make sure it is delivered on the 'expected date' then.
The cycle of life: born > learn > work > learn > dead.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment