I may be about to start a new contract, indication is it is 6 months but I'm concerned there might not be 6 months worth of work in there. Is it acceptable to put a clause in the contract stating that the full 6 months will be payable should the project finish early? Or something to this effect? I'm willing to take it for the money being offered, but not if 70% through they close the project...?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Short term contract - is this clause acceptable?
Collapse
X
-
Short term contract - is this clause acceptable?
The cycle of life: born > learn > work > learn > dead. -
In return do you accept 8 months work for 6 months pay? If so, then it may fly as a fixed price contract bid. Otherwise forget it.
Usual disclaimers apply etc........Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k. -
You could ask for a contract based on a specific deliverable or stages of deliverables - bit like a builder who builds a conservatory, but I would guess you are in the game of supplying a service - if the client has no further need for said service he won't want to pay you - thats why he's using a contractor and not a permie.Cenedl heb iaith, cenedl heb galonComment
-
Originally posted by chris79 View PostI may be about to start a new contract, indication is it is 6 months but I'm concerned there might not be 6 months worth of work in there. Is it acceptable to put a clause in the contract stating that the full 6 months will be payable should the project finish early? Or something to this effect? I'm willing to take it for the money being offered, but not if 70% through they close the project...?
*Hint* If the contract is for 6 months, and the client thinks it will take six months then it is your duty as a contractor to meet their expectations *hint*"Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.Comment
-
Originally posted by chris79 View PostI'm concerned there might not be 6 months worth of work in there.Comment
-
Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.Comment
-
Originally posted by Xenophon View PostI'd never do that.
Coffee's for closersComment
-
Originally posted by Spacecadet View Postover engineer thenRule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.Comment
-
FWIW, my experience of doing 6 months work in 4 months can reward you with another 6 months contract that runs for 7 months the year after. So everyone involved is a winner. It's happened to me twice with two clients.Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
Hah cheers for the replies guys.. interesting comments. Yeah I guess it's in my best interests to 'project manage' the situation to make sure it is delivered on the 'expected date' then.The cycle of life: born > learn > work > learn > dead.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment