Mate has divorced his missus after she had an affair with a mate. Child involved. Mate living in the house they both own. Ex refused to drop price a little a few months back against mate and estate agents advice. Hence Ex now seems very panicky about selling quick seeing prices fall, not rise, and still paying half the mortgage.
Ex has since left work and is being looked after financially by the ex mate.
Mate spent a weekend away down south, agreed that ex could collect the dining table (present from ex's folks to both, but, she is claiming it back).
When mate arrived home, he found pictures and furniture moved around and she also took his laptop out of a leather case which she has taken. Also took the dvd player. Ex knows dvd's and laptop are important to mate.
To me, appears that ex is using mind games to make mate feel violated in his own home. (Only he lives there with his daughter when he has her, although they both pay mortgage etc until it is sold).
Mate cannot lower price as negative equity - ex will have to put up and continue to pay up.
Given that ex has moved furniture and pictures, and, taken more than was agreed, can mate have any legal support in banning her from the house unescorted? Technically they both have equal rights as they both own, although only mate living there.
Ex also brought a yucky table in place of the really nice dining table and expected mate to pay £50 for it. Needless to say, mate told ex to stuff it.
Ex has since left work and is being looked after financially by the ex mate.
Mate spent a weekend away down south, agreed that ex could collect the dining table (present from ex's folks to both, but, she is claiming it back).
When mate arrived home, he found pictures and furniture moved around and she also took his laptop out of a leather case which she has taken. Also took the dvd player. Ex knows dvd's and laptop are important to mate.
To me, appears that ex is using mind games to make mate feel violated in his own home. (Only he lives there with his daughter when he has her, although they both pay mortgage etc until it is sold).
Mate cannot lower price as negative equity - ex will have to put up and continue to pay up.
Given that ex has moved furniture and pictures, and, taken more than was agreed, can mate have any legal support in banning her from the house unescorted? Technically they both have equal rights as they both own, although only mate living there.
Ex also brought a yucky table in place of the really nice dining table and expected mate to pay £50 for it. Needless to say, mate told ex to stuff it.
Comment