Originally posted by TimberWolf
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I'm Back!!!!!!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
You'd "judge" someone based on an internet forum? That's not very bright, is it?Originally posted by bogeyman View PostChildish.
Aren't we all 'hard bastards' behind the keyboard eh?
I know you purport to be some 6' 5" rugby-playing hardman, (and on the sq no-less!) but for all I know you're just a sad, fantasist twat.
Who knows eh? The only way to judge people on these boards is by what they say.
Calling some guy's 7 year old son scum really says a lot about you.
I'll leave it at that.
I don't want this thread to run on and on with more personal insults and comments.
There are plenty of people who visit this forum who have met me "in the flesh".
6ft 8", ex-rugby player yes, hard man, not really.
On the square? Yes, try me and prove me.
You really can't handle people standing up to you, can you?Comment
-
surely that would be female scum?Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostCould scum under 16 be called scumette?Coffee's for closersComment
-
I think the point is (perhaps I'm missing the point) that calling a seven year old, who you've never met and are judging on an emotional response that he doesn't fully understand yet "potential scum", because you've got something against football because of hooliganism 15 years ago is, out of order.Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostI think we need to establish what age it is okay to call football fans scum. I tentatively suggest this to be 15. Potential scum can be younger, but I’m not going there.
Or is it the fact that ‘fans’ shouldn’t be called scum that is the issue?
Calling adults who cry at the death of people who they've never met, or indeed idiots running riot after too much booze in Manchester "scum" is totally "in-order"."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Comment
-
Oh FFS!Originally posted by Churchill View Post...
You really can't handle people standing up to you, can you?
Is that you 'standing up to me' ?
(ok, i'm shytting myself now)
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Thank you for your opinion. Duly noted. However, it hasn't changed my opinion one iota.Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostI think (perhaps I'm missing the point) is that calling a seven year old, who you've never met and are judging on an emotional response that he doesn't fully understand yet "potential scum", because you've got something against football because of hooliganism 15 years ago is, out of order.
Calling adults who cry at the death of people who they've never met, or indeed idiots running riot after too much booze in Manchester "scum" is totally "in-order".Comment
-
I tell you what, if we're going to get ridiculous about this, yes it is. What are you going to do about it?Originally posted by bogeyman View PostOh FFS!
Is that you 'standing up to me' ?Comment
-
Nothing. Just like you're going to do about it.Originally posted by Churchill View PostI tell you what, if we're going to get ridiculous about this, yes it is. What are you going to do about it?
This is a forum on the internet, not Dodge City.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Perhaps him growing up to become a captain of industry (and yet still a football supporter) might sway you.Originally posted by Churchill View PostThank you for your opinion. Duly noted. However, it hasn't changed my opinion one iota.
I doubt it, but only time will tell."See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment