Originally posted by Blunderer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Sued for Damages After Contractor Ineptitude
Collapse
X
-
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone -
Originally posted by Blunderer View PostHello everyone, I am looking for some reassurance here from anyone experienced in the industry.
We are a Permanent Recruitment Consultancy who place the odd contractor here and there.
We placed a candidate with a company for 2 months around Christmas time. Everything went fine and he has now left. We are now chasing the money they owe us (we have paid him up to date through his umbrella company) and they have just revealed the following:
Apparently the chap was terrible and made some serious errors when working there. So much so that he brought down their network and supposedly affected their business.
They are now refusing to pay the bill (£15Kish) and, forthermore, are going to sue us, the recruitment company, for damages.
I have not come up against this before. I assume that I will be covered in my public indemnity insurance for this, and the contractor will be as well.
Does anyone know how the claim process will work? Will they sue us then we sue him? Will the insurance companies sort it out between themselves? Will the umbrella companies be involved? Somebody somewhere will be contesting this claim of course, but I am not sure whether it will be me or someone else.
I have informed my insurers and have made an appointment with my legal advisers, but I just wondered if anyone had any experience of this. Is there any way my insurers may try to wriggle out of this one on a technicality or anything?
Any help or comments on similar scenarios would be appreciated. Are there any agency owners or senior managers out there, perhaps? Or mature contractors with legal experience?
thanks in advanceComment
-
Originally posted by bogeyman View PostLAWYERS:
Inventing legs upon which to stand since time immemorial
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
This happened to me once. (I was a director of the consultancy and the man on the ground that they complained about).
In our case the client were skint and under pressure and they used this technique to try and avoid paying. We eventually settled for them paying part of our bill - mainly because the client was based in Rome and we felt that the cost of fighting would be ruinous.
They signed all the timesheets, tried to stop me leaving on the last day because they wanted me to look at a fault in a part of the system that they wrote. Then came out with all sorts of crap - publishing the documentation that I wrote on their intranet became publishing their trade secrets, etc etc.
It isnt a company with operations in Wales and Italy is it ?Comment
-
Originally posted by Blunderer View Post
We are a Permanent Recruitment Consultancy who place the odd contractor here and there.
We placed a candidate with a company for 2 months around Christmas time. Everything went fine and he has now left. We are now chasing the money they owe us (we have paid him up to date through his umbrella company) and they have just revealed the following:
Apparently the chap was terrible and made some serious errors when working there. So much so that he brought down their network and supposedly affected their business.
They are now refusing to pay the bill (£15Kish) and, forthermore, are going to sue us, the recruitment company, for damages.
I have not come up against this before. I assume that I will be covered in my public indemnity insurance for this, and the contractor will be as well.
Does anyone know how the claim process will work? Will they sue us then we sue him? Will the insurance companies sort it out between themselves? Will the umbrella companies be involved? Somebody somewhere will be contesting this claim of course, but I am not sure whether it will be me or someone else.
I have informed my insurers and have made an appointment with my legal advisers, but I just wondered if anyone had any experience of this. Is there any way my insurers may try to wriggle out of this one on a technicality or anything?
Any help or comments on similar scenarios would be appreciated. Are there any agency owners or senior managers out there, perhaps? Or mature contractors with legal experience?
thanks in advance
1) Sounds like they are trying to avoid payment.
2) Why doesn't your contact protect you?
3) Surely it stated that the contractor was working under the client's direction and control?
4) Apart from sweeping statements what evidence have they presented?
5) What does the contractor say to all this?
6) Why not call a meeting of the three interested parties to discuss and resolve the issues?
7) At the risk of sounding rude------stick to what you know and leave contracting to the competition.
8) and finally......do the obvious; consult a lawyer!Comment
-
Originally posted by Blunderer View PostHello everyone, I am looking for some reassurance here from anyone experienced in the industry.
We are a Permanent Recruitment Consultancy who place the odd contractor here and there.
We placed a candidate with a company for 2 months around Christmas time. Everything went fine and he has now left. We are now chasing the money they owe us (we have paid him up to date through his umbrella company) and they have just revealed the following:
Apparently the chap was terrible and made some serious errors when working there. So much so that he brought down their network and supposedly affected their business.
They are now refusing to pay the bill (£15Kish) and, forthermore, are going to sue us, the recruitment company, for damages.
I have not come up against this before. I assume that I will be covered in my public indemnity insurance for this, and the contractor will be as well.
Does anyone know how the claim process will work? Will they sue us then we sue him? Will the insurance companies sort it out between themselves? Will the umbrella companies be involved? Somebody somewhere will be contesting this claim of course, but I am not sure whether it will be me or someone else.
I have informed my insurers and have made an appointment with my legal advisers, but I just wondered if anyone had any experience of this. Is there any way my insurers may try to wriggle out of this one on a technicality or anything?
Any help or comments on similar scenarios would be appreciated. Are there any agency owners or senior managers out there, perhaps? Or mature contractors with legal experience?
thanks in advance
Surely on his timesheets was some wording to the effect that they're signing off that these are the hours worked and that the work was satisfactory? You've not heard anything until it came time to pay the bill? They had a contract with you, so why ever not?
If no wording then you're oop the proverbial creek without the paddle. Chalk it down to experience, swallow your loss, and learn how to be a business.
If the wording is there, then go to court and apply for a winding up order against them.
This case is really that binary. All this talk of insurers is bollox.Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Blunderer View PostHello everyone, I am looking for some reassurance here from anyone experienced in the industry.
We are a Permanent Recruitment Consultancy who place the odd contractor here and there.
We placed a candidate with a company for 2 months around Christmas time. Everything went fine and he has now left. We are now chasing the money they owe us (we have paid him up to date through his umbrella company) and they have just revealed the following:
Apparently the chap was terrible and made some serious errors when working there. So much so that he brought down their network and supposedly affected their business.
They are now refusing to pay the bill (£15Kish) and, forthermore, are going to sue us, the recruitment company, for damages.
I have not come up against this before. I assume that I will be covered in my public indemnity insurance for this, and the contractor will be as well.
Does anyone know how the claim process will work? Will they sue us then we sue him? Will the insurance companies sort it out between themselves? Will the umbrella companies be involved? Somebody somewhere will be contesting this claim of course, but I am not sure whether it will be me or someone else.
I have informed my insurers and have made an appointment with my legal advisers, but I just wondered if anyone had any experience of this. Is there any way my insurers may try to wriggle out of this one on a technicality or anything?
Any help or comments on similar scenarios would be appreciated. Are there any agency owners or senior managers out there, perhaps? Or mature contractors with legal experience?
thanks in advance
Like any business, you're taking risks, so you need to be prepared for those and take the correct precautions. I'm surprised that you didn't seem to know how well this contractor was doing before you were threatened with legal action over his performance. Was it really bad or is that a client excuse to not pay you? Didn't you have a clause in your contract with the client to ensure they had a duty to inform you as soon as things went wrong with the contractor's performance, so that you could take remedial action to terminate the engagement immediately if it couldn't be remedied or get a replacement or at least find out what this contractor was playing at?
To be honest with you, I'm not at all surprised that 'agencies' like you (and you are an agency because you place permies) are in this mess. It seems commonplace for clients to use the wrong type of recruitment organisations to source for their flexible resources even when they are in fact EBs. It's a gripe that I've had for ages as most don't seem to have a clue what they are doing because they're not experienced in the vertical markets they specialise in or else they, like you, dabble in sourcing for roles requiring a specialised degree of knowledge that you clearly don't have experience of dealing with.
I hope you get it sorted, but I must say I am rather surprised you have the gumption to come on here asking for contractors advice over something that's got nothing to do with contractor issues.
Have you tried going on UKRecruit as well? They offer advice for recruiters. Why don't you check it out as you may find other recruiters who have had to deal with problems similar to what you're facing now.Last edited by Denny; 19 February 2008, 21:26.Comment
-
Only thing I would add, always think carefully about wording of any claim to insurers. Check the conditions, ensure you say nothing that could be a get out.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Try telling the client that as no payment has been made you hold the IP on all software produced by your man and that you are not licensing them to use it, or are licensing at a cost more than they owe. Get your legal bods on em to prove they aint using your stuff. Effectively stop em trading. Nightmare for em to prove they aint and if you can get a legal block on em you are laughing.
Tie em in knots.
When they say that the IP goes with the delivered product you then have em on the grounds that the product is up to scratch.
As ever: I am not qualified to give this advice.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Yesterday 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment