Originally posted by chicane
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
1 Month to become c# contractor?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Yeah, they can never quite find the right candidate but their projects are always delivered on time and very much under budget!Originally posted by Shimano105 View PostI definitely steer clear of those kind of tests! Free consultancy or what?!Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
Originally posted by chicane View PostIn that case maybe I misunderstood you. The technical test for my current contract was ok - I was given a Word doc containing requirements and a computer with the development environment on it, and given 3 hours to develop code to meet those requirements with the help of whatever Internet resources and books I needed.
The approach described seems to work well here - there's no deadwood within the team because 9 of 10 candidates fail the test.
I do agree with you on the paper-based technical tests - those are indeed bizarre. I know I'd fail many of them.
9 out of 10 fail! Hell's bells. That sounds like a piece of piss for anyone not blagging it. I sincerely hope that method becomes the standard.
It's when they either give you a paper based one or just reel off loads of irrelevent questions that I hate.Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
Feist - I Feel It All
Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)Comment
-
No no. It's an irregular noun.Originally posted by Pinto View PostIt's all the same. What differs is who said it:
Blagging - The term used by the perpretator of the act in an attempt to soften the blow e.g. Yes, I did blag a bit but I really wanted the job. No harm done, eh?
Lying - The term used by the furious victim of the act. e.g. Your code has cost me thousands, which is no wonder, judging by the pack of lies you unashamedly adorned your C.V. with.
Fraud - The term used by the prosecutor trying to put your arse in jail. e.g. What you did Sir,is a very serious fraudulent act.

I am a blagger.
You are a liar.
He is a convicted fraudster.
See? Far more succinct.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostNo no. It's an irregular noun.
I blag.
You are a liar.
He is prosecuted for fraud.
See? Far more succinct.
verbComment
-
"Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. "
Thomas JeffersonComment
-
Indeed dear Captain.Originally posted by Captain Jack View Post
verb
Do you think we should have some of those emoticon things with 'Grammar', 'Bollocks' on, as well as 'Spelling'?
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shimano105 View PostI definitely steer clear of those kind of tests! Free consultancy or what?!
I'd laugh if they found any commercial use for the code in that test.
I know what you're saying though - I'd definitely shy away from any technical test that looked as though it could directly result in commercial gain for the client.Comment
-
The bizarre thing is that the test should be trivial to anybody with just a couple of months experience in the skills required. There was even one guy who said to the interviewer following a dismal failure of the technical test "Never mind, I thought I'd see if I could blag my way through".Originally posted by PAH View Post9 out of 10 fail! Hell's bells. That sounds like a piece of piss for anyone not blagging it. I sincerely hope that method becomes the standard.
Cheek!!Comment
-
So, back to the original point then, 1 months total application to the subject should get me through then it's 'this time next year rodders...'Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment