• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Who's the biggest dork here?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Nicky G View Post
    On the bright side, you are also blessed with me. I am the biggest **** here.
    I thought tosser was 6 characters?
    ǝןqqıʍ

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
      32767 (0111 1111 1111 1111 in binary) is significant if it's contained in a 16-bit word which is treated as a signed two's-complement value, because incrementing it would cause it to wrap around to -32768 (1000 0000 0000 0000 in binary). If a 16-bit word is treated as an unsigned value then the maximum value it can contain is 65535 (1111 1111 1111 1111 in binary) - when incremented beyond that it would overflow and be reset to zero (0000 0000 0000 0000 in binary).

      So they are of equal significance depending on context - for example, it was VB treating a 16-bit value as signed two's-complement that wiped out all the posts on the 10 Downing Street web site's forum when post 32768 (which is actually -32768) was submitted. Had the post ID been treated as an unsigned value, then the incompetence of the developer(s) (and therefore at the heart of Government, as they hired them) wouldn't have been exposed for another few months.
      Geek!

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by AtW View Post
        Geek!

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
          32767 (0111 1111 1111 1111 in binary) is significant if it's contained in a 16-bit word which is treated as a signed two's-complement value, because incrementing it would cause it to wrap around to -32768 (1000 0000 0000 0000 in binary). If a 16-bit word is treated as an unsigned value then the maximum value it can contain is 65535 (1111 1111 1111 1111 in binary) - when incremented beyond that it would overflow and be reset to zero (0000 0000 0000 0000 in binary).

          So they are of equal significance depending on context - for example, it was VB treating a 16-bit value as signed two's-complement that wiped out all the posts on the 10 Downing Street web site's forum when post 32768 (which is actually -32768) was submitted. Had the post ID been treated as an unsigned value, then the incompetence of the developer(s) (and therefore at the heart of Government, as they hired them) wouldn't have been exposed for another few months.
          Ever heard of bore-nary?

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Denny View Post
            Ever heard of bore-nary?


            Denny is great!

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Denny View Post
              Ever heard of bore-nary?
              Originally posted by AtW View Post


              Denny is great!
              Get a room, you two

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by BrowneIssue View Post
                Brilliant! I shall steal that response, claim it as my own and recycle it many, many times.

                As for Dorkism, I've got a personal reference for being a geek (see .sig) does that count?
                Thank you, BrownIssue, you're very kind.
                I'm Spartacus.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
                  Thank you, BrownIssue, you're very kind.
                  Darn, forgot to log out.

                  I'm Spartacus.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Spartacus View Post
                    Darn, forgot to log out.

                    Not the first time

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X