Originally posted by SallyAnne
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Glasgow Bombers...
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
Can you really see the mainly Jewish (and pro-Israel) owned media outlets really giving Muslims more air time. Dream on. -
Oh well done. Good solution.Originally posted by BagpussGet rid of the 5th column in this country perhaps. Like they did in the 2nd world war.
Any ideas on how to implement this final solution?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Is that post post-ironicOriginally posted by ClippyCan you really see the mainly Jewish (and pro-Israel) owned media outlets really giving Muslims more air time. Dream on.
Last edited by Rantor; 3 July 2007, 12:22.Comment
-
Shoot all the parachuting nuns.Originally posted by Moscow MuleOh well done. Good solution.
Any ideas on how to implement this final solution?
HTH
Comment
-
They managed it in the second world war. I'm sure we could do it again. BTW drop the emotive language.Originally posted by Moscow MuleOh well done. Good solution.
Any ideas on how to implement this final solution?The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”Comment
-
Gee, I dunno...how about bitch slapping f8ckwits like Brian (Omar) Brooks for starters?Originally posted by sasguruWhat exactly do you want them to do?
And how do you know that perhaps without their information there might be many more atrocities than there have been?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770
That sums the whole conflict up quite nicely.
MailmanComment
-
What argument was this? Must have missed it ...Originally posted by The Lone GunmanHow many times Shaun before you finally grasp the argument.
There is a vast difference between having a choice and making a choice.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
The emotive language is there so you might draw some parallels with what happened in the second world war, with whole religious populations decimated regardless of country of origin - now I've spelled it out for you, care to answer the point?Originally posted by BagpussThey managed it in the second world war. I'm sure we could do it again. BTW drop the emotive language.
I haven't studied WWII in any great depth, other than a few naval battles but, AFAIR individuals from enemy countries were interned. Is that what you intend? Which countries are on the list for internment or is it to be based on religion?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
As I see it smokers have always had choices. They used to have the choice of giving up and continuing to smoke in the pub with the rest of us, or not as they see fit. They still have the choice of whereabouts they now stand out of doors obviously if they decide they are not up to the challenge of giving up. A host of options.Originally posted by The Lone GunmanHow many times Shaun before you finally grasp the argument.
There is a vast difference between having a choice and making a choice.
Do you actually have a point that you can express in anything other than unintelligible flowery vacuous waffle or shall we just move on?
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
So why can't they set up their own pub and smoke as much as they like in their own company?Originally posted by shaunbhoyAs I see it smokers have always had choices. They used to have the choice of giving up and continuing to smoke in the pub with the rest of us, or not as they see fit. They still have the choice of whereabouts they now stand out of doors obviously if they decide they are not up to the challenge of giving up. A host of options.
Do you actually have a point that you can express in anything other than unintelligible flowery vacuous waffle or shall we just move on?
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45

Comment