Originally posted by wendigo100
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Housing Shortage
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
There lies the path to Socialism...all a government can (and should) do is ensure everyone has the same chance of reaching adulthood (free healthcare) and has sufficient education to compete in the marketplaceHow fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think -
"Should" is the key word. Your point makes an assumption that all schools provide basic services which they do not. Those that do, do so to differering standards. So although you are right to say that we live in a meritocracy some people have more merit than others which enables them to enjoy advantages over other people.Originally posted by TrollI disagree, you are granted a basic level of education by the State - i.e. you should be able to read, write & calculate,these are the basic building blocks for anyone to succeed in the adult world.
As far as I am aware there are no impediments (and please point out any you are aware of) of people being allowed to be as successful as their natural talents allow - i.e. a meritocracy
Let me ask you. If a former project manager calls you up to do a job without seeing anyone else then that is hardly making a decision on the merits of the strengths of others is it?Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
You've earned the trust of a former PM. Isn't that meritocracy at work?Originally posted by DodgyAgentLet me ask you. If a former project manager calls you up to do a job without seeing anyone else then that is hardly making a decision on the merits of the strengths of others is it?
If I like Mars bars, I don't sample two or three other chocolate bars every time I go into a shop to buy one.Comment
-
Let me explain. 90% is my estimate of immigrants who do not pay their way, it is based on the following information taken from Andrew Brownes assessment. Quote: Immigrants overall do pay more in tax than they receive in benefits and consume in public services, but only because immigrants from North America, Japan and the EU pay so much more than their fair share. Immigrants from the Third World—who make up the entire net immigration to the UK—are on average less well educated, suffer higher unemployment, claim more of most forms of benefits, make more demands on public services such as schools and hospitals, and almost certainly do not pay their way on average. There are no figures for the UK, but official studies in the US show that the average adult Mexican immigrant will consume throughout their life time $55,200 more in services than they contribute in taxes.
(This assessment was made in 2001 before the eastern EUs were included in the EU statement above).
CD: They do not pay their way on average, they have more children, they have more elderly parents who were brought here never having worked at all, they are less educated, they suffer high unemployment. The US data suggest that the average poorly educated immigrant consumes quite a bit more than they pay tax. UK data do not exist but surely the trend is there for all to see, or would you like to concentrate on my faults again? I think people would be best advised to open their eyes to what is happening. As I said a small proportion of immigrants from developed countries pay inordinate amounts that enable people to justify all immigration. We should run the UK like a business, would you have 2-3 top sellers in your business making you loads of dough and stop there or would you have 10 to get very little more?
Another important aspect is the importation of disease. The esteemed poster Bagpuss pointed this out a few days ago. We have imported most of our HIV (hetero), if I apply the rate of growth amongst the indigenous population over the last 10 years to our new cases. The HIV burden will be over 1 million people in just 20 years. At 15K a year to treat, 15 thousand million (15 billion a year), that will be pounds not chocolate buttons.
One doesn’t have to be an economist, mathematician or statistician to follow this, it just doesn’t make economic sense and of course the social consequences are for all to see already. If we get our own people to do these jobs we wouldn’t have to fork out dough for nowt for them also.
I got accused of being a wind up merchant yesterday, I think one of those is someone who comes back with no alternative information spending 30 seconds to conjure up a cheap shot and claim victory.Last edited by Causus Deli; 24 May 2007, 10:49.Comment
-
The glaring hole in this is that you have made up the figure of 90% and also this is NOT the USA!!
Immigration in the US is completely different to immigration in the UK.
If you are basing your arguments on the above there is no point discussing it with you, problems with Mexican immigrants has absolutely no relevance to the UK at all and eastern europe is not the same as mexico/cuba/etc.Comment
-
The US data are just one small part of the overall evidence, which you conveniently pick on. None of this is certain, it’s an estimate, do you understand this concept? There is 40% unemployment in certain groups in certain areas do these people pay their way, do pensioner imports pay their way, do children? The answer is no they don’t. Does a black market worker who claims benefit pay their way?Originally posted by ArdescoThe glaring hole in this is that you have made up the figure of 90% and also this is NOT the USA!!
Immigration in the US is completely different to immigration in the UK.
If you are basing your arguments on the above there is no point discussing it with you, problems with Mexican immigrants has absolutely no relevance to the UK at all and eastern europe is not the same as mexico/cuba/etc.
There is no definitive answer, I have given a whole load of evidence and I get little back from you apart from this is not America. I know that, can you tell me why perhaps that poorly educated immigrants in the US should do worse/better/same than a similar person in the UK? Infact the only difference I can see if that healthcare is free here and so the cost of that is not born by the US in their case. This would tend to drive my arguments to concluding even worse than the US. Do you have anything else? Citing differences without consideration of how those differences are likely to effect assessments of a situation is not that helpful.Comment
-
[QUOTE=Causus Deli]Let me explain. 90% is my estimate of immigrants who do not pay their way, it is based on the following information taken from Andrew Brownes assessment. Quote: Immigrants overall do pay more in tax than they receive in benefits and consume in public services, but only because immigrants from North America, Japan and the EU pay so much more than their fair share. Immigrants from the Third World—who make up the entire net immigration to the UK—are on average less well educated, suffer higher unemployment, claim more of most forms of benefits, make more demands on public services such as schools and hospitals, and almost certainly do not pay their way on average. There are no figures for the UK, but official studies in the US show that the average adult Mexican immigrant will consume throughout their life time $55,200 more in services than they contribute in taxes.
(This assessment was made in 2001 before the eastern EUs were included in the EU statement above).
QUOTE]
OK - 1st things 1st. Who is Andrew Browne? Is his assessment an academic paper or something similar? Or if not, what is it? It would be good to know the provenance of your information before starting to address your points (although God only knows why I'm bothering).Comment
-
Somebody should. I can't be arsed today, but thanksOriginally posted by Old GregOK - 1st things 1st. Who is Andrew Browne? Is his assessment an academic paper or something similar? Or if not, what is it? It would be good to know the provenance of your information before starting to address your points (although God only knows why I'm bothering).
God made men. Sam Colt made them equal.Comment
-
I wouldn't normally be @rsed but he strikes me as a closet fascist with an unhealthy interest in gay penguins if you know what I mean.Originally posted by Euro-commuterSomebody should. I can't be arsed today, but thanks
Comment
-
Those bastard penguins!!! So damned cunning but oh so tasty!Originally posted by zeitghostIt'll all be academic soon when the first cases of incurable TB* that kills you in a month start turning up...
(*not a joke by the way, this exists in Southern Africa).Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Today 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Yesterday 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01

Comment