Originally posted by zeitghost
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Housing Shortage
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Old GregNot heard of that one. Incuable or untreatable? Any idea where I can read up on it?"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."Comment
-
Originally posted by zeitghostNew Scientist 3 or 4 weeks ago... does not respond to any combination of the usual drugs...Comment
-
Originally posted by Causus DeliThere is no definitive answer, I have given a whole load of evidence and I get little back from you apart from this is not America. I know that, can you tell me why perhaps that poorly educated immigrants in the US should do worse/better/same than a similar person in the UK? Infact the only difference I can see if that healthcare is free here and so the cost of that is not born by the US in their case. This would tend to drive my arguments to concluding even worse than the US. Do you have anything else? Citing differences without consideration of how those differences are likely to effect assessments of a situation is not that helpful.
If I ate nothing but apples all day and you started shouting about how bad pears were, how would that affect me ?? USA != UK therefore USA immigration issues != UK immigration issues. I could probably pull up a load of figures that shows how Switzerland doesn't have an immigration problem, how would that have any meaning on the UK's immigration problems.
The fact that you cannot see that this is a problem just goes to show you don't have a lcue what you are talking about!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by Causus DeliLet me explain. 90% is my estimate of immigrants who do not pay their way, it is based on the following information taken from Andrew Brownes assessment. Quote: Immigrants overall do pay more in tax than they receive in benefits and consume in public services, but only because immigrants from North America, Japan and the EU pay so much more than their fair share. Immigrants from the Third World—who make up the entire net immigration to the UK—are on average less well educated, suffer higher unemployment, claim more of most forms of benefits, make more demands on public services such as schools and hospitals, and almost certainly do not pay their way on average. There are no figures for the UK, but official studies in the US show that the average adult Mexican immigrant will consume throughout their life time $55,200 more in services than they contribute in taxes.
(This assessment was made in 2001 before the eastern EUs were included in the EU statement above).
CD: They do not pay their way on average, they have more children, they have more elderly parents who were brought here never having worked at all, they are less educated, they suffer high unemployment. The US data suggest that the average poorly educated immigrant consumes quite a bit more than they pay tax. UK data do not exist but surely the trend is there for all to see, or would you like to concentrate on my faults again? I think people would be best advised to open their eyes to what is happening. As I said a small proportion of immigrants from developed countries pay inordinate amounts that enable people to justify all immigration. We should run the UK like a business, would you have 2-3 top sellers in your business making you loads of dough and stop there or would you have 10 to get very little more?
Another important aspect is the importation of disease. The esteemed poster Bagpuss pointed this out a few days ago. We have imported most of our HIV (hetero), if I apply the rate of growth amongst the indigenous population over the last 10 years to our new cases. The HIV burden will be over 1 million people in just 20 years. At 15K a year to treat, 15 thousand million (15 billion a year), that will be pounds not chocolate buttons.
One doesn’t have to be an economist, mathematician or statistician to follow this, it just doesn’t make economic sense and of course the social consequences are for all to see already. If we get our own people to do these jobs we wouldn’t have to fork out dough for nowt for them also.
I got accused of being a wind up merchant yesterday, I think one of those is someone who comes back with no alternative information spending 30 seconds to conjure up a cheap shot and claim victory.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
[QUOTE=Old Greg]Originally posted by Causus DeliLet me explain. 90% is my estimate ...your information before starting to address your points (although God only knows why I'm bothering).
Have a great day and chill out, Pimms in the garden, 5pm, mine, OK?
http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/cs23.pdfComment
-
Originally posted by zeitghostNew Scientist 3 or 4 weeks ago... does not respond to any combination of the usual drugs...Comment
-
Originally posted by Causus DeliHIV tends to kill you too.Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgentYour statistics may be correct and so may many other of the things you say. But either because you are a racist or you are a tad on the thick side the way you put your points is done in such a way as to apply your criticisms to ALL members of ethnic groups. So the effect that it has is to stir up hatred of entire groups instead of putting things into any sort of objective contextComment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgentI see the battleground has been neatly shifted to aids. How many Polish immigrants did you say are HIV positive?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment