UK's Response to Iran: Discuss

[AlfredJPruffock]

We know about Blair's guilt. It was your guilt that was in question

What on earth should I be guilty about - did I send the UK forces to the Iraq ?

Didnt the most senior UK army top brass state last autunm we should leave Iraq ?

Why then - are we still there ?

So far, thank goodness - the sailors have come to no harm despite Blairs blustering exarcebating the chances of a peaceful resolution - my goodness you would have thought he was actually spoiilng for a fight - except we know is an honorable man without question.

I am sure sense will prevail and a diplomatic hostage exchange will take place.

[DodgyAgent]

What on earth should I be guilty about - did I send the UK forces to the Iraq ?

Didnt the most senior UK army top brass state last autunm we should leave Iraq ?

Why then - are we still there ?

So far, thank goodness - the sailors have come to no harm despite Blairs blustering exarcebating the chances of a peaceful resolution - my goodness you would have thought he was actually spoiilng for a fight - except we know is an honorable man without question.

I am sure sense will prevail and a diplomatic hostage exchange will take place.

Of more interest is why you choose to blame every single problem in the world from El Duders inability to pull women to Iran capturing British hostages on the invasion of Iraq? Is it because Bush and Blair are such an easy target for you and that by sneering at them as you do, you can make yourself seem incredibly clever?

[Mailman]

Or put another way, they flout international law and go in heavy handed with no regard for civilian casualties!

Sorta like them peace loving hisbullies firing unaimed rockets willy nilly at the nearest city they could hit or them peace loving allahers detonating on public transport or in restaurants.

Tell me, why dont we hear from surrender monkeys like you when the vast majority of the aggression is carried out by arab terrorists?

Oh thats right...thats cause its only bad when its them evil land grabbing jooooooos who carry out operations AFTER several of their soldiers had been murdered and others abducted INSIDE Israel!

Mailman

[Mailman]

So far, thank goodness - the sailors have come to no harm despite Blairs blustering exarcebating the chances of a peaceful resolution - my goodness you would have thought he was actually spoiilng for a fight - except we know is an honorable man without question.

I am sure sense will prevail and a diplomatic hostage exchange will take place.

You talk about common sense and diplomacy a lot dont you?

When the reality of the situation is that common sense should have dictated to them peace loving oppressed Iranians NOT to abduct the British sailors.

Of common sense and diplomacy had anything to do with the situation then the Iranians would have informed the British that them peace loving oppressed, yet diplomatic Iranians belived the Poms where in their territorial waters and then left it at that.

Common sense would sort of indicate that abducting the sailors at gun point and then parading them in front of tv cameras SHOULDNT have happened.

But then again, I guess the [mental] state you live in its only the West that can ever do wrong while them peace loving, oppressed, yet common sense coming out their ring pieces Iranians are in no way, shape or form at fault here.

I mean, as an example, if it was the British who had supplied two sets of coordinates instead of the Iranians I some how doubt you wouldnt be using this as an example of how the Poms got it right.

Instead what we see from surrender monkeys like yourself is a complete lack of questioning of the fact the Iranians only supplied another set of coordinates AFTER it had been pointed out to them the first set they supplied only confirmed the fact they had violated Iraqi territorial waters.

Further to this, if they TRUELY believed they were in Iranian waters...why change the coordinates to those that are in Iranian waters and not in Iraqi waters...cause if they believed they were in Iranian waters with their first set of coordinates they wouldnt have supplied another set would they?

in essence...you make Neville Chamberlain look like a war monger! BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Mailman

[Churchill]

Mailman is on your ignore list because he's a twat.

[AlfredJPruffock]

You talk about common sense and diplomacy a lot dont you?

When the reality of the situation is that common sense should have dictated to them peace loving oppressed Iranians NOT to abduct the British sailors.

Of common sense and diplomacy had anything to do with the situation then the Iranians would have informed the British that them peace loving oppressed, yet diplomatic Iranians belived the Poms where in their territorial waters and then left it at that.

Common sense would sort of indicate that abducting the sailors at gun point and then parading them in front of tv cameras SHOULDNT have happened.

But then again, I guess the [mental] state you live in its only the West that can ever do wrong while them peace loving, oppressed, yet common sense coming out their ring pieces Iranians are in no way, shape or form at fault here.

I mean, as an example, if it was the British who had supplied two sets of coordinates instead of the Iranians I some how doubt you wouldnt be using this as an example of how the Poms got it right.

Instead what we see from surrender monkeys like yourself is a complete lack of questioning of the fact the Iranians only supplied another set of coordinates AFTER it had been pointed out to them the first set they supplied only confirmed the fact they had violated Iraqi territorial waters.

Further to this, if they TRUELY believed they were in Iranian waters...why change the coordinates to those that are in Iranian waters and not in Iraqi waters...cause if they believed they were in Iranian waters with their first set of coordinates they wouldnt have supplied another set would they?

in essence...you make Neville Chamberlain look like a war monger! BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Mailman

American and British claims that there was no connection between the capture of Iranian officials on 11 January and the seizure of the British sailors and marines was undermined yesterday when the Iraqi Foreign Ministry official said his government was also working "intensively" for the release of those five other Iranians to "help in the release of the British sailors and marines".

[AlfredJPruffock]

Of more interest is why you choose to blame every single problem in the world from El Duders inability to pull women to Iran capturing British hostages on the invasion of Iraq? Is it because Bush and Blair are such an easy target for you and that by sneering at them as you do, you can make yourself seem incredibly clever?

Correct me if I am wrong altough Bush and Blairs flawed decision to wage war in Iraq has directly led to the standoff with Iran I have never claimed El Duders issues are connected with Blairs foreign policy.

That is - To the best of my knowledge.

But - hey - isnt it great that El Duder has the freedom not to pull women - try doing that in North Korea and see how far you get.

[Mailman]

I think the very fact that Israels Arab neighbours are prepared to sit down with them is an admission of Israels existence.

Awe bless...how naive of you

Mailman

[DodgyAgent]

Correct me if I am wrong altough Bush and Blairs flawed decision to wage war in Iraq has directly led to the standoff with Iran I have never claimed El Duders issues are connected with Blairs foreign policy.

That is - To the best of my knowledge.

But - hey - isnt it great that El Duder has the freedom not to pull women - try doing that in North Korea and see how far you get.

How do you not know that El Duder may only be able to become aroused by Asian women, who now wont touch him because of the Iraq war?

there Alf, I have made the argument for you

[Clippy]

Awe bless...how naive of you

Mailman

Oh really.

How so, pray tell.