• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Gordo's action against "artificial" companies

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    "** when I was a permie civil servant."

    So the job you do now which is so different to that of a permie civil servant, does it entail going on site using the skills you picked up as a permie civil servant and working along side permies, who depending on the client, might well be permie civil servants.

    "**Quite well - I'd love to see the figures on how much extra tax he's captured."

    And so would we, but the IR are unable to give us this information. The PMG has been asked this in the house but could not answer it.
    Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

    I preferred version 1!

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by SallyAnne
      No it wasn't - it was designed to catch contractors who are for all intents and purposes, employees.

      I've worked with a sh*t load of them over the years, and I know the difference! And I'm not one.
      Good! Glad you can work that out yourself. I'm assuming you've looked at all their contracts, line by line.

      And also, I asume you've submited all your contracts for review by the HMRC, stood by your principles and obligued accordingly?

      Originally posted by SallyAnne
      You're absolutely right though - us lot should be taxed much much more than we are. It needs to be addressed, and I have faith in Gordon that he'll do just that.
      Yes, I agree. All small business should be taxed to the point of not being able to invest in their business and have the opportunity to grow and create wealth. I mean, despite my company bidding for contracts with other companies in a competitive arena, I should be prevented fiscally from investing in my company to employ people to take advantage of growth, for instance. FFS...

      Originally posted by SallyAnne
      Unlike you bunch of tory toffs, I believe in paying taxes, and I believe the rich should pay more than (and in a lot of cases pay FOR) the poor.
      This is so pavlovian and lacks so much thought in soe many levels, I despair at so called business people's ability to think and argue business principles coherently in our present society.

      Originally posted by SallyAnne
      Bring it on Gordon - I welcome it.
      Sadly, if you do, you'll end up being one of the people being shafted by his policies: once the economy goes tango uniform, you'll lose your contract job, you'll traipse over to the benefits office and find, as one of gordon's "tax avoiders", you won't be able to claim your precious benefits that you'll suddenly proclaim with a loud voice that "the rich must pay for"

      I think of all the ridiculous postings that have been made over the years, Chico's pales into insignificance compared with your most recent. I can only hope you were being tongue-in-cheek.
      If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by SallyAnne
        Unlike you bunch of tory toffs, I believe in paying taxes, and I believe the rich should pay more than (and in a lot of cases pay FOR) the poor.

        I dont come here much and never had anything against but now you do sound like a left bloody socialist!

        Why should someone who earns more money through hard work pay for someone who earns less money no matter how they earn it?

        Comment


          #54
          Taxes

          The tax burden overall is actually quite low in the UK.
          What is surprising about the below is the low level in NZ

          I do think that the rate of pay / level of taxes , or the level of VAT is generally too high for the low paid when compared to the high paid but the Government is not very quick to force people out to work and instead spoon feed them benefits to stay in bed.

          Also other countries have a slightly higher tax rate (such as the Netherlands) but are totally corrupt so the level of tax you actually pay may be lower.
          Itally for example, has in the past just taken 10% out of all bank accounts without notice but there tax system is a little shall we say erratic.



          Reference from: http://www.dol.gov/ilab/media/report...ok/chart22.htm
          March 2007

          As a share of GDP, taxes on labor (personal income, all contributions to government social security funds, and payroll taxes) were lower in the U.S. than in most European countries but higher than in all of the Asian countries.
          The tax burden on labor was relatively high in Sweden and Denmark, and low in Asian countries, especially Korea.

          Country Percent
          U.S. 19.1
          Australia 13.6
          Japan 14.4
          Korea 8.1
          New Zealand 15.3
          Austria 25.6
          Denmark 28.1
          France 24.6
          Germany 23.4
          Italy 21.3
          Netherlands 19.0
          Norway 18.8
          Portugal 14.4
          Spain 17.1
          Sweden 36.5
          U.K. 16.9

          Comment


            #55
            The simple fact of the mater is that if IR35 wasn't so punitive and balanced out the risk to tax ratio in a fairer way people wouldn't be so keen to avoid it, by his measures I have gone from paying him 30% of my income to 20% which is the opposite of what he wanted but he has forced me down that route, I and tens of thousands of others over the past few months have done the same so I guess he'll be scratching his head and wondering why it doesn't add up in a few months time.
            Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

            Comment


              #56
              This doesn't take into account of other secondary taxes, such as NI, council tax, fuel duty, VED, inheritance tax, stamp duty, cap gains etc does it?
              If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by EqualOpportunities
                In part Sal, I agree.

                I do, however, resent to my very core, paying for the lay about, lazy b@stard, useless, Lacoste wearing, Nike shod, Elizabeth Duke gold adorned, baseball cap done up too tight and perched precariously but still stylishly sideways upon shaven tramlined head, Job Seekers Allowance claiming, dope smoking in front of daytime telly, shopping in Maccy D's, Booze Busters and JJB only, populous which we are currently supporting.

                Just my opinion though.
                And I deeply resent, to my very core, paying for the useless, State heading, Normal Hartnell designed frumpy frock wearing, bejewelled crown donning, gold gilded pram trawling, ribbon cutting, corgi owning, posh relly hanger on supporting, Buck House gaff living, horse breeding and racing supporting, greedy tax sponging already rich in her own right battleaxe known as 'Our Lil.'
                Last edited by Denny; 21 March 2007, 17:43.

                Comment


                  #58
                  Just like the good old days. Banging on about taxes.

                  If you don't like the taxes here, you are free to leave.

                  Comment


                    #59
                    "The tax burden overall is actually quite low in the UK."

                    Does that include all the stealth taxes and the taxes applied to duty etc? While income tax and NI + employers NI might seem low, a large and growing chunk seems to find its way back to the government through various forms of taxation.
                    Rule Number 1 - Assuming that you have a valid contract in place always try to get your poo onto your timesheet, provided that the timesheet is valid for your current contract and covers the period of time that you are billing for.

                    I preferred version 1!

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by s2budd
                      The tax burden overall is actually quite low in the UK.
                      Sorry, but that is utter bollox. I am pretty sure that just about everyone reading this board would pay lower taxes in Denmark than they would in the UK.

                      I know I do, and yet I pay the highest rate in Denmark...
                      Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                      threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X