BBC
In other words, Butler accuses Blair of deliberately lying.
Surely not?
In the UK House of Lords last month, Lord Butler, who headed an investigation into the intelligence which took Britain into the war, accused Tony Blair of being "disingenuous" in the way he used intelligence - Whitehall-speak for "deliberately misleading".
"Mr Blair told Parliament... that the picture painted by our intelligence services was 'extensive, detailed and authoritative'. Those words could simply not have been justified by the material that the intelligence community provided to him."
It has emerged that MI6, the Secret Intelligence Service, was up-front about its lack of first-class intelligence about Iraq. It told Tony Blair it hadn't known much about Iraq's work on chemical and biological weapons since 1988. In fact, at some stage in the 1990s, Saddam got rid of most of his weapons of mass destruction
But it was the discreet unquestioning support from Whitehall which meant the government was able to massage the intelligence in order to bolster its case.
"Mr Blair told Parliament... that the picture painted by our intelligence services was 'extensive, detailed and authoritative'. Those words could simply not have been justified by the material that the intelligence community provided to him."
It has emerged that MI6, the Secret Intelligence Service, was up-front about its lack of first-class intelligence about Iraq. It told Tony Blair it hadn't known much about Iraq's work on chemical and biological weapons since 1988. In fact, at some stage in the 1990s, Saddam got rid of most of his weapons of mass destruction
But it was the discreet unquestioning support from Whitehall which meant the government was able to massage the intelligence in order to bolster its case.
Surely not?
Comment