• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Blair "disingenuous" about Iraq WMDs - Lord Butler"

Collapse

  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by TheOmegaMan
    What we need is a regulator to regulate politics and funded by the political parties. A mandatory 5% charge should be levied on every political party and all politicians should be degree qualified. Forget the electorate they don't matter - the regulator should hold politicians to account for then there is financial motitivation - party funds.
    Good suggestion - still my blueprint for the UK's political future would consist of

    1) The immediate dissolution of the Current Political Parties

    2) The instatement of high street Banks as the replacement parties to represent the UK electorate

    I think voting for Barclays, Natwest or Royal Bank of Scotland etc would be a more effective and less patronising system that the current schema - besides in a way it is the Banks that ultimately rule UK politics - time to cut out the smiling ineffectual middlemen.

    Of course the Banks manifestos would only vary by minute differences in macro-economcis ef what interest rate to set etc but remember folks - no matter whom you vote - the government always gets in.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    2,000,000 Iraqis now live outside Iraq, according to UNHCR

    From a self-confessed 'pretty decent guy' legacy to the people of Iraq


    12,000 doctors have fled Iraq since the war began. Another 2,000 are said to have been killed, and at least 250 kidnapped

    50% Average inflation in 2006, according to the World Bank

    6.3 hours of electricity daily in Baghdad in December 2006. In May 2003 there were 16-24 hours

    32 percentage of people in Iraq with drinkable water

    3,700,000 Iraqis now receive food aid from the UN World Food Programme

    16% Proportion of Iraqis who said in January that their income meets their basic needs

    Not to mention the people who have died ...

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss
    You couldn't make this up, John Bolton, one of the biggest hawks in the Bush Government was on Newsnight last night. He blaimed the WMD shambles on Blair, he reckoned the US only thought he had the scientific intelectual ability to acquire them.
    I believed and indeed said this two years ago, when it emerged that the US had relied on Blair's dossier to fill in the gaps in their own intelligence. More fool the US.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    "I hope that people know me well enough and realise that I would never do anything to harm the country or anything improper. I never have. I think most people who have dealt with me think that I am a pretty straight sort of guy.”

    Tony Blair 1997

    Leave a comment:


  • TheOmegaMan
    replied
    What we need is a regulator to regulate politics and funded by the political parties. A mandatory 5% charge should be levied on every political party and all politicians should be degree qualified. Forget the electorate they don't matter - the regulator should hold politicians to account for then there is financial motitivation - party funds.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    The ultimate humiliation attack on Blairs Iraq fantasy was from Thatcher who said she would not have went to War on the data which Blair had, on the basis that as a scientist, more compelling evidence would have been required.

    But then again - Thatcher was not a wannabe Popstar.

    For the record - John Bolton is a Saddamist defeatist who ought to have been hung with his paymaster.
    Last edited by AlfredJPruffock; 22 March 2007, 15:39.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Ruprect
    Does anyone believe what that idiot has to say? It seems like all the neocon hawks are taking a stroll down slippery shoulder street on their way to scapegoat city... holes
    Mailman did

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss
    You couldn't make this up, John Bolton, one of the biggest hawks in the Bush Government was on Newsnight last night. He blaimed the WMD shambles on Blair, he reckoned the US only thought he had the scientific intelectual ability to acquire them . Where is Mailman/Shaunbhoy when you need him?
    Does anyone believe what that idiot has to say? It seems like all the neocon hawks are taking a stroll down slippery shoulder street on their way to scapegoat city... holes

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    You couldn't make this up, John Bolton, one of the biggest hawks in the Bush Government was on Newsnight last night. He blaimed the WMD shambles on Blair, he reckoned the US only thought he had the scientific intelectual ability to acquire them . Where is Mailman/Shaunbhoy when you need him?

    Leave a comment:


  • wonderwaif
    replied
    Originally posted by The Farmer
    Not sure what your point is.

    Have you run out of poems??
    Here's one:

    Went to see the captain, strangest I could find,

    laid my proposition down, laid it on the line-

    I won't slave for beggar's pay, likewise gold and jewels,

    but I would slave to learn the way to sink your ship of fools.



    Ship of fools on a cruel sea,

    ship of fools sail away from me.

    It was later than I thought when I first believed you,

    now I cannot share your laughter, ship of fools.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Farmer
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock
    Lord Butler is nothing but a Saddamist anti-democratic terrorist - try telling your socialist rants to all the Iranian women whose husbands were murdered by Saddam - so called Lord Butler.
    Not sure what your point is.

    Have you run out of poems??

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock
    Lord Butler is nothing but a Saddamist anti-democratic terrorist - try telling your socialist rants to all the Iranian women whose husbands were murdered by Saddam - so called Lord Butler.
    AlfredJPruffock is nothing but a pro-iranian terrorist - try telling your socialist rants to all the Iraqi women whose husbands were murdered by the iranians - so called AlfredJPruffock.

    Leave a comment:


  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Lord Butler is nothing but a Saddamist anti-democratic terrorist - try telling your socialist rants to all the Iranian women whose husbands were murdered by Saddam - so called Lord Butler.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Farmer
    replied
    We all knew this anyway!!

    Nobody used to listen to me when I said Blair was disingenuous.

    Lord Butler must be more credible than me.

    Hey-ho

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    You do realise this is the ULTIMATE humiliation?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X