Ultimate cuk disgusted of Tunbridge Wells thread

[Churchill]

Hmmm - lets just leave this one.

You're too sexy to have a serious conversation with anyway.

That's why I love you sooooo much.

You've become my little "Eliza".

[The Lone Gunman]

You called me more than that, but I realise for some insults are the last resort of a lost argument. I have answered your questions and I am not homophobic. You keep saying that because you think it will censor me, it won't. Keep saying it!

I suggest you get one of these then you can make all the labels you like;

http://www.gypsyqueen.dk/data/Image/...abel-maker.jpg

Oh forgot, called you a tosser too, but you have gone well down the line of proving that one in this thread and others.
As I said, all in response to your suggestions that I may be gay and a paedo to boot.

You may be in denial about homophobia, but you are homophobic.
If you accepted gays as being natural and equal you would have no problem with these books. defacto homophobe.
As I said before replace gay with black and see if it sounds racist.

[John Galt]

Sorry Galty, I hadn't realised I had to reply to all your posts.
It is also hard to keep up with everybody and I do have work to do.

So, I missed it, when did you say you made the choice?

Quite alright dear boy - I didn't.

[SallyAnne]

I don't think I did slate you SA but from what I can see you have all hurled abuse at each other - very common on this board and in real life when people are arguing; you know what they say - if you can't stand the heat......

I defended Baggy's argument not the abuse and yes I am am a reasonable man but not when people shout!

fair enough.

I'll try to keep it down in future.

[SallyAnne]

That's why I love you sooooo much.

You've become my little "Eliza".

You'll never be able to train the "common" out of me I'm afraid, but I'd certainly let you try

[EternalOptimist]

You'll never be able to train the "common" out of me I'm afraid, but I'd certainly let you try

LOL

[Bagpuss]

Oh forgot, called you a tosser too, but you have gone well down the line of proving that one in this thread and others.
As I said, all in response to your suggestions that I may be gay and a paedo to boot.

You may be in denial about homophobia, but you are homophobic.
If you accepted gays as being natural and equal you would have no problem with these books. defacto homophobe.
As I said before replace gay with black and see if it sounds racist.

Oh Dear, you are having a tizzy fit, I have not said you were a paedo, Sally Anne got that bee in her bonnet. AFAIK gay isn't a skin colour.

The practice of Homosexuality is not normal by the definition of normal - FACT

Are homsexuals wrong - no I don't think they are wrong.

Are they a minority that practices a sexual diversion? - Yes

Do children need to learn an alternative lifestyle at 5? No

Should they be learning it? No I think it will confuse them, and it's a minority issue. most children will not have gay parents. They certainly won't be worried about it.


If you, CB, SA et al (one or two others) want to write an alternative language (oh yeah that's what PC is isn't it?) where everything has a different meaning, do that, but don't expect me and the majority of the population to accept it.

you see quite alot of people have a problem with these books, why don't you set up a poll about the issue and see how 'normal' you are.

I thank You

Bagpuss

[John Galt]

Oh forgot, called you a tosser too, but you have gone well down the line of proving that one in this thread and others.
As I said, all in response to your suggestions that I may be gay and a paedo to boot.

You may be in denial about homophobia, but you are homophobic.
If you accepted gays as being natural and equal you would have no problem with these books. defacto homophobe.
As I said before replace gay with black and see if it sounds racist.

No I'm sorry but I can't agree with that. Homosexuals should never be considered 'unequal' (although personally I think that striving for equality is disasterous for society as a whole but I digress) but homosexuality is not 'natural' - copulation between a woman and a man is 'natural' as that is how we procreate as a species. You cannot use the 'racist' analogy in the school books argument either - homosexuality is sexual preference and that is all and when all is said and done the issue of sexual preference should not be introduced to 5 year olds. Obviously this is just my opinion but it does not make me a homophobe - just someone who wants children to enjoy their childhood without political manipulation

[The Lone Gunman]

No I'm sorry but I can't agree with that. Homosexuals should never be considered 'unequal' (although personally I think that striving for equality is disasterous for society as a whole but I digress) but homosexuality is not 'natural' - copulation between a woman and a man is 'natural' as that is how we procreate as a species. You cannot use the 'racist' analogy in the school books argument either - homosexuality is sexual preference and that is all and when all is said and done the issue of sexual preference should not be introduced to 5 year olds. Obviously this is just my opinion but it does not make me a homophobe - just someone who wants children to enjoy their childhood without political manipulation

OK. I am going to walk away from this one.
I do hope that neither you nor Baggy ever have to deal with an 11 year old who has strung himself up because he knows he is an abomination. Saved that one, quite well adjusted now. Missed 2 others though.

[Churchill]

FFS, all we're talking about here is who you want to have sex with!

Christ on an effing bike!

Kids need to be told about the mechanics of sex and reproduction. The rest they can learn from the mistakes that we all make, it's called growing up!