• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Ultimate cuk disgusted of Tunbridge Wells thread

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by John Galt
    Dont f*****n shout you self-opinionated mare. People who disagree with you are not, by default, morons. This is not about trying to 'teach' our children to be gay it is about introducing the subject of sex to a bunch of primary school kids. Being gay is purely about your sexual preference and IMHO this is not a suitable subject for kids of this age. I have many gay friends but I don't need to 'understand' them just accept them for who they are - I don't need, my kids don't need, none of us need other peoples life styles rammed down our throats. Kids will learn about sexual preferences when they are older as a result of natural curiosity and that is as it should be.
    I can shout if I want - who exactly do you think you are John?
    Why dont you just feck off from replying to my posts? Go crave attention from someone else eh?
    The pope is a tard.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by SallyAnne
      Its common sense!!! Why aren't whole families of children gay then? If it's based on social influences?
      or whole schools of children?

      if youhonest need science to tell you, then...

      http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ncs/news...er/sexgene.htm
      Then why do children need educating that being gay is prefferable to being straight. Who is behind this? Someone with pent up guilt about their own life?
      The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

      But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

      Comment


        #23
        A lot of hostility here people, come on now lets all be friends.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by Bagpuss
          Being gay is a sexual perversion, albeit a socially acceptable one. It should never be described as being normal

          The pope is a tard.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by SallyAnne
            I can shout if I want - who exactly do you think you are John?
            Why dont you just feck off from replying to my posts? Go crave attention from someone else eh?
            Ok shout but it makes you look like an ill mannered big mouthed know it all. Your post was offensive - as are all your posts when someone disagrees with you. Oh and re the craving attention - post and kettles love

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Bagpuss
              Then why do children need educating that being gay is prefferable to being straight. Who is behind this? Someone with pent up guilt about their own life?

              Who's teaching them that it's more preferable?!!!!
              The pope is a tard.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Bagpuss
                Then why do children need educating that being gay is prefferable to being straight. Who is behind this? Someone with pent up guilt about their own life?
                It's not a case of being preferable Baggy it's just a case of NL ensuring that no-one can ever be discriminated against ever - this is natural progression from banning Rupert the Bear 'cos they had a golliwog in the story. Pathetic I know but there you are that's what happens when you allow a bunch of loony lefties to be in charge.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by SallyAnne
                  Who's teaching them that it's more preferable?!!!!
                  Oi, stop writing comments like that so big!

                  Some of us are at work and it's sort of hard not to see those comments from the other side of the room if you get my point

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by SallyAnne
                    Its common sense!!! Why aren't whole families of children gay then? If it's based on social influences?
                    or whole schools of children?

                    if youhonest need science to tell you, then...

                    http://oregonstate.edu/dept/ncs/news...er/sexgene.htm
                    Well then, that explains all the bent flies.

                    An excerpt 'The findings cannot be directly correlated to the control of human sexual preference and behavior. But the researchers said in their report the data is relevant and "there is a variety of evidence in vertebrates, including humans, suggesting that male sexual behavior, including sexual orientation, has a genetic component."'

                    Suggesting, not proving. Not even suggesting beyond reasonable doubt, merely suggesting...

                    Also, surely if it were genetic, it would have bred itself out by now - as, contrary to some blinding impirical evidence you will doubtless turn up from the darkest corners of the internet, same sex couples cannot naturally have children...
                    Last edited by EqualOpportunities; 12 March 2007, 16:12.
                    The squint, the cocked eye and clenched first are the cornerstones of all Merseyside communication from birth to grave

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by SallyAnne
                      Who's teaching them that it's more preferable?!!!!
                      Whoever that is writing stories about princes rejecting princesses in favour of men. Having sex with a man is a sexual perversion not a normal sexual activity. These books are designed to imply it is more normal than normal infact preferable. How can that be right?

                      What next, Ali Baba and the forty sheep? a story of a man in love with his flock?
                      The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

                      But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X