Sure sounds like censorship to me...

[Snooky]

I would quite rightly be locked up.

Don't tease us

[vetran]

Don't tease us

only on Thursdays when NLyUK does her bondage Teas.

[wattaj]

Two things. 1) You clearly have no grasp of what Linehan engages in. Doxxing trans people is not 'pointing out the objective reality of trans activism'. Catfishing trans people on dating apps is not 'pointing out the objective reality of trans activism'. Regarding yourself akin to 1930s anti nazi resistence fighter is not 'pointing out the objective reality of trans activism'.

2) I have read the judgements, I know you have no legal background, so the irony in your shade is hilarious.

I do. I follow this debate closely. His contributions are robust and appropriate.

Read them again, or get someone that understands them to explain them to you.

[JustKeepSwimming]

I do. I follow this debate closely.

The brain rot shows.

His contributions are robust and appropriate.

His 200,000 tweets about trans people has cost him his craft, his career, his friends and his family. If you regard that contribution as appropriate then so be it, I refer counsel to my previous statement.

Read them again, or get someone that understands them to explain them to you.

No u. You make zero arguments beyond 'HEERRRR DEERRR THE LAW IS ON OUR SIDE!'. The notion that because holding negative opinions on Islam is a protected belief doesn't mean that Tommy Robinson can't be 'cancelled' from an open mic night is absurd and not ground in reality.

[SueEllen]

only on Thursdays when NLyUK does her bondage Teas.

[wattaj]

The brain rot shows.
...
His 200,000 tweets about trans people has cost him his craft, his career, his friends and his family. If you regard that contribution as appropriate then so be it, I refer counsel to my previous statement.
...
No u. You make zero arguments beyond 'HEERRRR DEERRR THE LAW IS ON OUR SIDE!'. The notion that because holding negative opinions on Islam is a protected belief doesn't mean that Tommy Robinson can't be 'cancelled' from an open mic night is absurd and not ground in reality.

There are a few things going on here and your inability to keep on point is wearing... I regard Linehan's contributions to the Trans debate to be appropriate given what is at stake: the unnecessary and experimental medicalisation of children; the insertion of mediocre, male-bodied people into women's sport; and the wanton destruction of safeguarding around single sex spaces.

The reaction of the media and the entertainment world to those contributions I find to be shameful. I doubt that history will be kind to his detractors. Time will tell.

FYI: holding negative opinions on Islam is NOT protected under the EA2010. The right to not believe, and to not be discriminated against because of this unbelief, is... you should read it; it's really very interesting and would help you to not embarrass yourself in public.

So, a simple question for you given your apparent stance on this issue: do you believe that male-bodied people should be allowed to undress and shower in communal changing rooms alongside children and teenage girls?

[JustKeepSwimming]

There are a few things going on here and your inability to keep on point is wearing... I regard Linehan's contributions to the Trans debate to be appropriate given what is at stake: the unnecessary and experimental medicalisation of children; the insertion of mediocre, male-bodied people into women's sport; and the wanton destruction of safeguarding around single sex spaces.

The ends justify the means? Where have we heard that before?

The reaction of the media and the entertainment world to those contributions I find to be shameful. I doubt that history will be kind to his detractors. Time will tell.

"am I so out of touch, no it's the children who are wrong"

FYI: holding negative opinions on Islam is NOT protected under the EA2010. The right to not believe, and to not be discriminated against because of this unbelief, is... you should read it; it's really very interesting and would help you to not embarrass yourself in public.

You're trying to play semantics, poorly. Is Richard Dawkins atheist beliefs protected? Does his atheist beliefs inherently include negative opinions on religions?

So, a simple question for you given your apparent stance on this issue: do you believe that male-bodied people should be allowed to undress and shower in communal changing rooms alongside children and teenage girls?

Well that isn't a simple question is it. What is the context? Why is it inherently wrong for an underage girl to see a male bodied person naked but it's not inherently wrong for a underage boy to? Is a father not able to take his daughter to the swimming pool and get changed together?

[KinooOrKinog]

Well that isn't a simple question is it. What is the context? Why is it inherently wrong for an underage girl to see a male bodied person naked but it's not inherently wrong for a underage boy to? Is a father not able to take his daughter to the swimming pool and get changed together?

You're in dangerous territory with that comment. The reason for single sex spaces is because there's places where women are vulnerable and some men can't be trusted not to take advantage of that.

[vetran]

You're in dangerous territory with that comment. The reason for single sex spaces is because there's places where women are vulnerable and some men can't be trusted not to take advantage of that.

as above - if I put on lippy and a dress can I wander round the ladies changing room with my bits out?

I don't want my wife or children to suffer that or similar.

now my daughters are past 7 neither of us want so see either of us naked.

[Eirikur]

So, a simple question for you given your apparent stance on this issue: do you believe that male-bodied people should be allowed to undress and shower in communal changing rooms alongside children and teenage girls?

My football coach when I was a 9/10 year old kid in the 70's used to shower with us kids, after training and matches, at the time we were just awed by his large hairy d!ck and didn't bother us. Now I'm just wondering, why did he do that?