• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Cruel landlord evicts young couple & their children

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Zigenare View Post

    The duties on behalf of the Head of State are what the Head of State says they are.
    It would be a damn site easier to find a "role" for Andrew than to penalise him the way that the King is currently. Do I think King Charles can be a vindictive SoB? Oh yes.
    Why do you think Charles should find a role for a disgraced royal who was stripped of his position by the former queen to protect the family?
    You think that being given a 10-bedroom 'cottage' worth millions to live in is being 'vindictive'? I wish Charles would be that vindictive to me.


    Originally posted by vetran View Post
    ...
    Gosh, she's really in a petty mood today. Wrong side of bed dear?


    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by WTFH View Post

      My initial post says that they spent the money on renovations, which Vet says they didn't spend, by linking to an article that says they have repayed the money they spent.
      Either they spent £2.4m or they didn't. I was stating that they did spend the money, and have since paid it back. I didn't start off by claiming they paid builders with their own money.
      They didnt spend the money on renovations, they decided to make a contribution. They contributed cash so any perceived obligations would be ended. I'm know it's pendantic, appologies.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by d000hg View Post

        Why do you think Charles should find a role for a disgraced royal who was stripped of his position by the former queen to protect the family?
        You think that being given a 10-bedroom 'cottage' worth millions to live in is being 'vindictive'? I wish Charles would be that vindictive to me.


        Gosh, she's really in a petty mood today. Wrong side of bed dear?

        that's hate speech "IT" mis pro nouned me!
        Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

        Comment

        Working...
        X