• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

DOOM: "Omicron Covid cases ‘doubling every two to three days’ in UK"

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    Quite possibly. I'm rather losing interest in the whole non-debate. But in my defence (such as it is!) I was using the figures from the ONS website, which should be accurate. A lot of other numbers come from American research results, which are not directly comparable to the UK situation..
    Fwiw, I don't think the Graun is helping matters with their reporting. There's a difference between the actual science and the reporting of it, which is often quite bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post

    I think you’re confusing two separate things. There’s a hospitalisation rate and an infection hospitalisation rate. Two different denominators.
    Quite possibly. I'm rather losing interest in the whole non-debate. But in my defence (such as it is!) I was using the figures from the ONS website, which should be accurate. A lot of other numbers come from American research results, which are not directly comparable to the UK situation..

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    Hospitalisation rates in the UK are currently 6.4 per 100,000. That's 0.0064%, rather less than the above "even if Omicron causes a less severe hospitalisation rate of 1% or 0.5% compared with Delta’s 1.5%, " and the bulk of those are for unvaccinated patients. So why trust the rest of the article?

    Scientists have agendas too, you know.

    As for the evolutionary pressure thesis, it's neither the Darwin/Wallace speciation mechanism nor Lamarck's deterministic one but the rather more recent studies on how evolution works and the speed at which Darwin's "beneficial mutations" operate in a real world population. Facebook is oddly quiet on that subject sadly, so I had to go and read some published (and peer reviewed) papers. It's what happens when you have a life-long interest in the subject. But agsint ignoraance, the Gods themselves strive in vain.
    I think you’re confusing two separate things. There’s a hospitalisation rate and an infection hospitalisation rate. Two different denominators.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by mattster View Post

    So multiple academics in the field are going to the trouble of pointing out that this old trope is total misinformation, but we're supposed to ignore them and listen to someone who researches via Facebook whilst on the can?
    Hospitalisation rates in the UK are currently 6.4 per 100,000. That's 0.0064%, rather less than the above "even if Omicron causes a less severe hospitalisation rate of 1% or 0.5% compared with Delta’s 1.5%, " and the bulk of those are for unvaccinated patients. So why trust the rest of the article?

    Scientists have agendas too, you know.

    As for the evolutionary pressure thesis, it's neither the Darwin/Wallace speciation mechanism nor Lamarck's deterministic one but the rather more recent studies on how evolution works and the speed at which Darwin's "beneficial mutations" operate in a real world population. Facebook is oddly quiet on that subject sadly, so I had to go and read some published (and peer reviewed) papers. It's what happens when you have a life-long interest in the subject. But agsint ignoraance, the Gods themselves strive in vain.

    Leave a comment:


  • mattster
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post

    The problem with using the Grauniad as a source...

    If your host is moving about and not incapacitated or at death's door , the virus will have more opportunity to spread. So a strain with a lower or slower lethality will have the evolutionary advantage.

    Don't confuse Darwin with Lamarck.

    But I agree the lethality of omicron is still an unknown.
    So multiple academics in the field are going to the trouble of pointing out that this old trope is total misinformation, but we're supposed to ignore them and listen to someone who researches via Facebook whilst on the can?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    ""It adds: “The rapid spread of Omicron means that action to limit pressures on the health system might have to come earlier than intuition suggests.” Its calculations suggest that even if Omicron causes a less severe hospitalisation rate of 1% or 0.5% compared with Delta’s 1.5%, then “stringent national measures’” would be needed by 18 December at the latest."

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...k-leak-reveals

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    If your host is moving about and not incapacitated or at death's door , the virus will have more opportunity to spread. So a strain with a lower or slower lethality will have the evolutionary advantage.
    “99% of transmission occurs before anybody even gets to hospital,” the severity of disease is “a very minor selection pressure”.



    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    For idiots who keep posting tulip about "200 years of viral understanding bulltulip" -

    ""Ferguson said, at present, however, there was very little data on the severity of disease caused by the new variant, and that it was not necessarily the case that viruses evolved to cause less severe illness – such a situation only occurs if it favours their transmission. With Covid, as “99% of transmission occurs before anybody even gets to hospital,” the severity of disease is “a very minor selection pressure”.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-ferguson-says
    The problem with using the Grauniad as a source...

    If your host is moving about and not incapacitated or at death's door , the virus will have more opportunity to spread. So a strain with a lower or slower lethality will have the evolutionary advantage.

    Don't confuse Darwin with Lamarck.

    But I agree the lethality of omicron is still an unknown.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    For idiots who keep posting tulip about "200 years of viral understanding bulltulip" -

    ""Ferguson said, at present, however, there was very little data on the severity of disease caused by the new variant, and that it was not necessarily the case that viruses evolved to cause less severe illness – such a situation only occurs if it favours their transmission. With Covid, as “99% of transmission occurs before anybody even gets to hospital,” the severity of disease is “a very minor selection pressure”.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...-ferguson-says

    Leave a comment:


  • NorthWestPerm2Contr
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Really? Most people I know haven't had it at all.
    Working is fully remote but every week we have at least a couple of staff off due to covid. In the local schools entire classes are catching it and taking it home. Football games are getting cancelled! I think nearly everybody will have caught at at least once by now.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X