• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

DOOM: "Omicron Covid cases ‘doubling every two to three days’ in UK"

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jamesbrown
    replied
    No changes for variants as far as I'm aware. Some companies have said they could do it (e.g., within 100 days for Pfizer) if it were necessary, but I'm not sure it has really proven necessary yet and there are obvious trade-offs w/r to production and saleability (would you really want the "old" one, even if it afforded reasonable protection?). As to whether they are actively working on them, I think so, but that is different from them reaching production. I think there is also work underway on more generally applicable vaccines (i.e., "one to rule them all"), so the work is towards generalisation as well as specialisation, I think. You can take this fwiw - just following it with a passing interest, no expertise.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    So here's a question are the vaccines all in current use still the 1.0 versions developed against Covid Classic (Alpha?) Every time there's a new variant "is the vaccine effective" is the hot question and we know the vaccine is very good against Kent/Delta and somewhat less so against Omicron ("good enough" perhaps an accurate assessment)

    We've been told that vaccines can be updated to new variants very quickly, using the plug-n-play analogy, but has this yet happened? Is the AZ/Pfizer jab you get today the exact same stuff you did when they first launched?

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    It does appear things are not getting worse at least but with daily deaths in the 300s that's pretty bad, and deaths may yet to peak. Remember when hundreds dying every day was considered a really bad thing?

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    109k infections, hospitalisations seems to be slowing down...

    Past the peak or not?
    Past peak of testing.
    Hospitalisations slowing down would be a positive if there were beds and staff available to deal with them, I suspect some people are finding that they are being turned away or referred to their GP.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    109k infections, hospitalisations seems to be slowing down...

    Past the peak or not?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post

    Test criteria changed now, it's not like for like anymore insofar as infections are concerned
    That's ignoring the tests that have never been processed....

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    One problem with this is all the private hospitals I live near or go pass have recruitment banners advertising for staff.

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/...-omicron-surge
    Hospitals in England will be able to use private hospitals and staff under a deal with the NHS to maintain services as Omicron cases surge, avoiding delays in treatment for patients with illnesses such as cancer.

    The move comes as hospitals have also been told to find extra beds in gyms and education centres owing to rising numbers of Covid patients.

    The three-month agreement means private healthcare staff and facilities will be on standby to support the NHS if they need it and to maintain services for patients that can be referred including some of those waiting for cancer surgery.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by WTFH View Post
    The Christmas figures are starting to come through and based on the data it looks like R=3.8 is where we're heading (2 more weeks until the next data set is officially released)
    Test criteria changed now, it's not like for like anymore insofar as infections are concerned

    Leave a comment:


  • WTFH
    replied
    The Christmas figures are starting to come through and based on the data it looks like R=3.8 is where we're heading (2 more weeks until the next data set is officially released)

    Leave a comment:


  • Whorty
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    ""Nearly 40% of Covid hospital cases in England now patients primarily being treated for something else, latest figures show

    NHS England has this morning published its latest “primary diagnosis” supplement. This is a dataset that shows how many of the daily Covid hospital cases are patients being treated in hospital for Covid, and how many are patients with Covid being treated primary for something else.

    The hospital figures that are published daily do not make this distinction

    The latest figure is for Tuesday 4 January and it shows that in England 13,045 patients were in hospital with Covid on that day, but only 8,200 for Covid. That means only 63% of Covid cases were in hospital primary because of Covid.

    This figures has been drifting down. The equivalent figure for the previous Tuesday, when total Covid cases were 8,321, was 67%, and the Tuesday before that, when overall cases were 6,245, 71% of them were people being treated primary for Covid. At the start of December the figure was 74%.

    As PA Media reports, the number of patients being treated primarily for Covid rose from 5,578 on 28 December to 8,200 a week later (a jump of 47%), while those with Covid but being treated primarily for something else rose from 2,743 to 4,845 (a jump of 77%).

    The figures cover acute hospital admissions only"

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics...latest-updates
    Well done, you got there in the end. Give yourself a gold star

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X