Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
wanna be in my gang? - well you can't!
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostLooked this seems to be the original article, this seems fascinating, the Capone approach seems to be the way to target the leaders then work down from them. I wonder why we don't do that?
Why Drug Dealers Live With Their Moms - Los Angeles Times (latimes.com)
this is sad not surprising :
The point I was trying to make earlier (maybe not explicit enough), is that the people at the very top are very well protected, often behind front businesses, shady lawyers etc. If it was that easy, then the police would be focusing much more on that knowing if you take out the top structure, the pyramid below is likely to be disproportionately hit. I know a couple of people who work in tacking serious organised crime and from the very little they've told me, it can take years to build up a case against the people at the top of organised gangs.Comment
-
Originally posted by edison View PostYes, that's the article. I love the comparison between major drug gangs' org chart and McDonalds!
The point I was trying to make earlier (maybe not explicit enough), is that the people at the very top are very well protected, often behind front businesses, shady lawyers etc. If it was that easy, then the police would be focusing much more on that knowing if you take out the top structure, the pyramid below is likely to be disproportionately hit. I know a couple of people who work in tacking serious organised crime and from the very little they've told me, it can take years to build up a case against the people at the top of organised gangs.
I am sure its hard but we do really need to change tack because what we are doing is not working. I think unexplained wealth orders are the way to go. Even if we cant lock them up we can take the money!
Also sharing this detail with potential recruits via people they respect and stopping rap/drill's drug dealing references would be a good startAlways forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostAha now I see why the Daily Mail outraged.
Who needs evidence, gets in the way of entertaining court hearings.I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post
Also sharing this detail with potential recruits via people they respect and stopping rap/drill's drug dealing references would be a good start
Edited - actually I was wrong there is a few of them - Drill rap gang banned from making music without police permission in legal first | The Independent | The Independent I just read up about one of them in The Guardian."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostHow do you prove membership, do you have to be a card-carrying member?Comment
-
Originally posted by vetran View PostOh dear
Courts urged to avoid using the word with reference to criminals because of 'negative connotations' | Daily Mail Online
Here's an idea why not just lock a few more of the ring leaders up and the "gangs" stop existing.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Comment