- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Nice to see someone putting their wealth to charitable use
Collapse
X
-
-
Enforcing division, beautifulAs it is a feminist project, only female crew members are allowed to speak in the name of the Louise Michel.
-
They're saving lives, so don't let yourself get triggered by the feminism aspect.Originally posted by TheGreenBastard View PostEnforcing division, beautiful
Comment
-
But it's very triggering. Double virtue signalling.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostThey're saving lives, so don't let yourself get triggered by the feminism aspect.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Isn't virtue signalling just expressing your opinion publicly? In this case, someone is putting their money to good use to save lives. Objecting to it because of the feminist ethos is like objecting to the Salvation Army's good works because of their Christian ethos.Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostBut it's very triggering. Double virtue signalling.Comment
-
Why are you mentioning being triggered, are you projecting, are you triggered?Originally posted by Old Greg View PostThey're saving lives, so don't let yourself get triggered by the feminism aspect.
Also, are you implying you can't appreciate one act and raise an eyebrow at another?
You have a very insecure and derisive attitude sometimes - where did I object?Originally posted by Old Greg View PostIsn't virtue signalling just expressing your opinion publicly? In this case, someone is putting their money to good use to save lives. Objecting to it because of the feminist ethos is like objecting to the Salvation Army's good works because of their Christian ethos.Comment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostThey're saving lives, so don't let yourself get triggered by the feminism aspect.
Why not reverse it to a Misogynist attitude and then the lefties would fall over themselves to attack it.
The problem with rescuing the migrants from their folly is that encourages more to endanger themselves.
I don't wish to see loss of life but instead of dealing with the problem they are accentuating it.
Send the UN to stop the systemic rape & abuse in the camps and make sure the refugees are safe, then tell them none will qualify for asylum if they travel to Europe as they are safe there. No more deaths in te sea.Comment
-
Virtue signalling is saying "look at me, I'm so virtuous because I support this cause" while not actually doing anything about it. Triggered gammons think it's "doing good".
That does happen, sadly.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostObjecting to it because of the feminist ethos is like objecting to the Salvation Army's good works because of their Christian ethos.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
False equivalence between misogyny and feminism. The reverse of misogyny is misadnry.Originally posted by vetran View PostWhy not reverse it to a Misogynist attitude and then the lefties would fall over themselves to attack it.
The problem with rescuing the migrants from their folly is that encourages more to endanger themselves.
I don't wish to see loss of life but instead of dealing with the problem they are accentuating it.
Send the UN to stop the systemic rape & abuse in the camps and make sure the refugees are safe, then tell them none will qualify for asylum if they travel to Europe as they are safe there. No more deaths in te sea.Comment
-
I assume your post around division was sarcastic, hence my inferences. But you seem upset so I'll leave it now.Originally posted by TheGreenBastard View PostWhy are you mentioning being triggered, are you projecting, are you triggered?
Also, are you implying you can't appreciate one act and raise an eyebrow at another?
You have a very insecure and derisive attitude sometimes - where did I object?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Today 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Yesterday 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51

Comment