Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
This will cost several billion and push back the 5G rollout by several years. Meanwhile Chinese cyber-criminals will continue to access systems via the internet. Why would anyone bother to try attacking via a mobile transmitter, it's pointless, you can use your own mobile.
The real question should be why we don't have our own technology?
Exactly.
How is it China gets to build Huawei in space of 10-15 years where as UK isn't even trying.
Heck - Sweden and Finland done better in this critical space, why would not their 5G equipment be bought?
I guess the answer is they are not subsidised to further needs of their Govt intellgence apparatus, and they don't hire people like Lord Browne who prostitute their names to further not even allies, but major rivals!
The real question should be why we don't have our own technology?
...because everybody is working in the Finance industry earning more than you would get in manufacturing telecommunications equipment.
If there was a huge effort to match Huawei, then the question would be "why are the Chinese so successful in Finance", and the answer would be because everyone is working on 5G telecom systems.
To be fair, this is actually Trump's doing. Had he not banned the Chinese using US chips as part of his childish trade war, meaning they have switched to their own brand ones, they could then potentially introduce their own interesting design features. All that's happened is that the risk profile has changed significantly and banning their use is merely the sensible option.
Comment