Put protesters, their lawyers and anybody connected to no-fly list
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Climate campaigners win Heathrow expansion case
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIt’s safer not having to do it and gain altitude first.Comment
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostAt what altitude would you feel safe the turn occurring at? How many miles travelling in the wrong direction are you willing to pay for in order to have a nice shipping tanker style turning circle that doesn't give you the collywobbles? The cost of the extra fuel for the detour and the extra fuel needed to cover the weight of that extra fuel really doesn't stack up.Comment
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostAt what altitude would you feel safe the turn occurring at? How many miles travelling in the wrong direction are you willing to pay for in order to have a nice shipping tanker style turning circle that doesn't give you the collywobbles? The cost of the extra fuel for the detour and the extra fuel needed to cover the weight of that extra fuel really doesn't stack up.Comment
-
Originally posted by Zigenare View PostI think you've been made aware that we don't use facts where AtW is concerned, they confuse him.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostI don’t want minute fuel savings to endanger passengers - add more runways to take off in the right direction in the first place, and offer first dibs on manual hard work to them protesters - obviously supervised by somebody trustworthy
Taking off in the right direction??? They already do!
You are aware that aircraft take off INTO the wind, yes? So building more runways will not remove the need to turn the aircraft towards a westerly direction if wind conditions mean they had to take off towards the east.Comment
-
Comment
-
This one was pretty cool from the other week
Video: Airbus A380 '''crab''' landing at Heathrow in Storm Dennis winds - Business InsiderComment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostPut protesters, their lawyers and anybody connected to no-fly listComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Yesterday 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
Comment