Originally posted by Whorty
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Climate campaigners win Heathrow expansion case"
Collapse
-
Yep. Absolutely correct.Originally posted by Whorty View PostStar of David would work because then you always have 2 runways running parallel. With the 2 surviving runways, building a third in a different direction would be slightly bonkers (and ironically reduce capacity).
Leave a comment:
-
-
Happy to accept mods decision on who is the turd for the said turd to get say 30 days ban
Leave a comment:
-
Agreed! Mods please flush the turn identified in this thread - Today, 10:56Originally posted by AtW View Post
I rest my case, time for flushing.
Leave a comment:
-
I believe you may be projecting somewhat here. No one likes turd projecting...Originally posted by AtW View PostThen you are looking in the mirror, this is obvious from your turdy worldview that everybody is a turd who lives in a toilet, albeit different ones.
Mods - flush this one!
Mods, I'll let you decide on what should happen next.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah, you are clearly biased - it’s like asking Red Hat if she minds being eatenOriginally posted by Jog On View PostI'm very happy about this. There are already too many planes going overhead around where I live. The residents of Richmond/Twickenham were polled on the 3rd runway, we voted no to it - then they ignored us and went ahead anyway.

Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Today 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50



Leave a comment: