Legal types - your advice would be appreciated!
Three days ago, after three months without a date And my nat king cole I had a choice of two tinder dates on the table (yep - they're like buses!). I chose the one that seemed a bit 'safer' having had a few months out of the game and needing my nat king. Both were 'sold' as full night experiences, cocktails, dinner, BJ, naughty sex with a good chance of extending into further sex sessions
After dinner she announced she was on the RAG and sex was out of the question, it turns out she knew she would be on the RAG this very night, I challenged her on this and she said It’s “just what she always did” and then admitted "perhaps we should have put no sex". Her attitude seems to be "you earn a lot you should expect this kind of thing".
The Misrepresentation Act of 1967 appears to suggest that I have a case for reparations here. Does anyone have any specific experience or knowledge that may help me decide whether to take further action? I don't want to burn bridges, but this is sex we're talking about and her misleading claim genuinely caused me to make the wrong decision at what may be a huge hard-on for several days. I can't afford another 3-month gap to my next nat king cole
Misrepresentation Act 1967
Any help appreciated.
Or even if anyone could lend a hand ????
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
Three days ago, after three months without a date And my nat king cole I had a choice of two tinder dates on the table (yep - they're like buses!). I chose the one that seemed a bit 'safer' having had a few months out of the game and needing my nat king. Both were 'sold' as full night experiences, cocktails, dinner, BJ, naughty sex with a good chance of extending into further sex sessions
After dinner she announced she was on the RAG and sex was out of the question, it turns out she knew she would be on the RAG this very night, I challenged her on this and she said It’s “just what she always did” and then admitted "perhaps we should have put no sex". Her attitude seems to be "you earn a lot you should expect this kind of thing".
The Misrepresentation Act of 1967 appears to suggest that I have a case for reparations here. Does anyone have any specific experience or knowledge that may help me decide whether to take further action? I don't want to burn bridges, but this is sex we're talking about and her misleading claim genuinely caused me to make the wrong decision at what may be a huge hard-on for several days. I can't afford another 3-month gap to my next nat king cole
Misrepresentation Act 1967
Any help appreciated.
Or even if anyone could lend a hand ????
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK Forum
Comment