- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Should Mark Field be charged with assault?
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostHe could have sat down and left it to security? Why did he feel the need to get involved?
Oh yes, instinct. Because what we really need from the "elite" representatives of the UK is wild aggression with no thought.
I suppose it could have been worse. It could have been Churchill doing the assaulting.....
What security?Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by vetran View Post....Comment
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostIf you can be charged for throwing milkshake over someone, then surely you can be charged for unprovoked physical assault. He could have shepherded her out, but instead he grabbed her at the back of the neck. Not clever.
No doubt the police will do nothing.....Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by vwdan View PostAs you've chosen to be all very clever and just move into ad hominem when I've tried to have nothing more than a genuine discussion, I'm just going to go ahead and ignore you.Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostHe could have sat down and left it to security? Why did he feel the need to get involved?
Oh yes, instinct. Because what we really need from the "elite" representatives of the UK is wild aggression with no thought.
I suppose it could have been worse. It could have been Churchill doing the assaulting.....Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.Comment
-
Originally posted by vwdan View PostAs you've chosen to be all very clever and just move into ad hominem when I've tried to have nothing more than a genuine discussion, I'm just going to go ahead and ignore you.
suits me. You just threw in a few assertions that were obviously foolish & incorrect so I commented on that and had some fun.Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by Zigenare View PostYou'd have just humped her leg.Comment
-
Field has been suspended from his ministry now. Really quite a successful stunt from the greenpeace lot.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Which IT contractor skills will be top five in 2025? Jan 2 09:08
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
Comment