Posting in general but sometimes you get some sense.
So the background.. I was away on a business trip in March, the first night I'm away the misses had several threatening calls early morning. We have one of them recorded. They knew her name and made sexual threats. Misses was petrified, we have recently moved to the country so you can imagine, large house backing onto fields.
Anyway, she called the police straight away and gave them the details.
We called the phone company and within a week they had the details of the number etc. But would only give it out to the police. We gave a statement to the police the women dealing with it, couldn't be arsed. Anyway, she said she had to apply for the phone number etc off the phone company. Weeks later nothing, apparently she went on long term sick leave. The person taking over, then went on long term sick leave.
Eventually, last week they got the details and the number belongs to a large retail firm and two names are associated with the number.
Anyway, the police have just came back and said that the retail firm said the phone was stolen in December. The police are therefore closing the case. That's it, just stopped replying to questions.
This just doesn't sound right or am i missing something. Large retail firm has phone reported stolen in December would the number still be active and paid for in March? Or if the police contacted the retail firm and they talked to the person holding the phone and they said it was stolen in December would they still not interview the person etc. What am I missing?
I know it's not the crime of the century, but I imagine the person makes these calls has done it a number of times and still its natural to want that person to be caught.
Is there anyway I can progress this and no my accountant doesn't have a ******* clue?
So the background.. I was away on a business trip in March, the first night I'm away the misses had several threatening calls early morning. We have one of them recorded. They knew her name and made sexual threats. Misses was petrified, we have recently moved to the country so you can imagine, large house backing onto fields.
Anyway, she called the police straight away and gave them the details.
We called the phone company and within a week they had the details of the number etc. But would only give it out to the police. We gave a statement to the police the women dealing with it, couldn't be arsed. Anyway, she said she had to apply for the phone number etc off the phone company. Weeks later nothing, apparently she went on long term sick leave. The person taking over, then went on long term sick leave.
Eventually, last week they got the details and the number belongs to a large retail firm and two names are associated with the number.
Anyway, the police have just came back and said that the retail firm said the phone was stolen in December. The police are therefore closing the case. That's it, just stopped replying to questions.
This just doesn't sound right or am i missing something. Large retail firm has phone reported stolen in December would the number still be active and paid for in March? Or if the police contacted the retail firm and they talked to the person holding the phone and they said it was stolen in December would they still not interview the person etc. What am I missing?
I know it's not the crime of the century, but I imagine the person makes these calls has done it a number of times and still its natural to want that person to be caught.
Is there anyway I can progress this and no my accountant doesn't have a ******* clue?
Comment