Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Ann Widdecombe
Collapse
X
-
-
With Old Smeg?Originally posted by Zigenare View PostWhat about that one time, at band camp?
Not human so does not count......Comment
-
Most woman are bi (90%+)Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI wish I had been gay. No children wrecking my life.
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK ForumComment
-
Bumming churchy every time you've had a few pints makes you at least bi.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI wish I had been gay. No children wrecking my life.Comment
-
Bitter?Originally posted by Old Greg View PostBumming churchy every time you've had a few pints makes you at least bi.Comment
-
It would be just horrible if people wanted to change their sexuality and science could provide an answer. Wouldn't it?
She did not, at least in the quote given (and the article certainly would have quoted her if she had), say or even imply that sexuality should be changed. But the activists will rant and rave and say all kinds of nasty things about her (vile, sick, poisonous) whilst accusing her of 'hate'. Simply because she suggested science may someday be able to help people who want to change their sexuality.
The activists want people who would like to change to be stuck forever. They don't want science to help them. They don't want there to be any possibility of changing sexuality. It's quite interesting and bizarre.Comment
-
Ann Widdecombe
Sure. If there was a clamour for it from gay people. Funnily enough, the ones that are “just asking” whether science has a solution tend to be straight.Originally posted by WordIsBond View PostIt would be just horrible if people wanted to change their sexuality and science could provide an answer. Wouldn't it?
It’s called “context”. Her comments are not in isolation, they are part of a long history of voting against equality. She hasn’t “simply suggested” anything, she has a long and verifiable history.She did not, at least in the quote given (and the article certainly would have quoted her if she had), say or even imply that sexuality should be changed. But the activists will rant and rave and say all kinds of nasty things about her (vile, sick, poisonous) whilst accusing her of 'hate'. Simply because she suggested science may someday be able to help people who want to change their sexuality.
Voting record - Ann Widdecombe, former MP, Maidstone and The Weald - TheyWorkForYou
“The activists” want nothing of the sort. They want people who would like to change gender to have access to medical and psychological facilities. For science to help them.
The activists want people who would like to change to be stuck forever. They don't want science to help them. They don't want there to be any possibility of changing sexuality. It's quite interesting and bizarre.
I know that you mean “gay people that don’t want to be gay any more”, but think about how ludicrous that sounds if you reverse it - “straight people that don’t want to be straight any more”. Under what feasible circumstances do you think a person could be sitting there and thinking, “I don’t want to be straight any more, instead of just being gay I need science to help me to turn gay”.
Bizarre indeed.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Some of the divorced on this forum? "I've bloody had it with women. I wish I found men attractive instead."Originally posted by meridian View Post... Under what feasible circumstances do you think a person could be sitting there and thinking, “I don’t want to be straight any more,
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21

Comment