Originally posted by PRC1964
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
David Bellamy on Global Warming
Collapse
X
-
Nope, simply because it doesn't freeze upstream anymore either. Neither does any other river in the country freeze 1 foot thick (which is what would be the minimum required to have stalls and hundreds of people out on the ice) like they used to a couple of hundred years ago. -
No they aren't. I'll put it more simply. Global Warming is a natural phenomena that would be happening anyway. The human effects are accelerating this natural process. Better?Originally posted by sasguruAh well your statements are inconsistent then ....Comment
-
By how much?
If all carbon use stopped today, what effect would it have?
I suspect close to diddly.Comment
-
You hope you mean.Originally posted by DimPrawnBy how much?
If all carbon use stopped today, what effect would it have?
I suspect close to diddly.
Maybe the earth is flat, yes I've decide it's flat! All people who disagree are tree hugging commies, come on someone agree with me then we can declare it as fact. Yes the earth being round is Nu Lie spin!Last edited by Numptycorner; 19 December 2006, 11:46.I remember the good old days of this site when people used to moan about serious contractor related issues like house prices and immigration. How times have changed!?Comment
-
Wrong again. From the report:Originally posted by DimPrawnBy how much?
If all carbon use stopped today, what effect would it have?
I suspect close to diddly.
"In the light of new evidence and taking into account the
remaining uncertainties, most of the observed warming over
the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the [anthropogenic] increase in greenhouse gas concentrations"
PS This is getting tedious. It's like arguing with Christians. Criticise the science or shut the feck up. I'm not interested in people's "revealed by voices in my head" opinion.Last edited by sasguru; 19 December 2006, 11:49.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Okay, I'll do my bit. I'm getting rid on my 6 litre twin turbo V12 and get a basic 5 litre V8 supercharged at trade in time.
Okay?Comment
-
Ah. that's why I prefer to listen to scientists.Originally posted by stackpoleI watched a BBC science docudrama a year or two back about a manned space-ship touring the planets.
When they got to Venus, which was 450 degrees C and air pressure 100 times what it was on Earth, they said that this will happen to Earth if men continue to use fossil fuel at their current rate.
That's an example of "scientists".Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Keyword is "most", which is entirely consistent with what I said, especially over such a short period of time. And I am actually a qualified scientist in this area.Originally posted by sasguruWrong again. From the report:
"In the light of new evidence and taking into account the
remaining uncertainties, most of the observed warming over
the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the [anthropogenic] increase in greenhouse gas concentrations"Comment
-
Ah excellent. Now we agree.Originally posted by Cowboy BobKeyword is "most", which is entirely consistent with what I said, especially over such a short period of time. And I am actually a qualified scientist in this area.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Perhaps we do, however the media seems to protray it as 100% the fault of man, which is quite wrong.Originally posted by sasguruAh excellent. Now we agree.
But then, I've hardly ever read a decently researched media piece on science yet - though some are better than others. If you've ever cringed when reading a technology piece in the paper, you know what I'm talking about...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Comment