Originally posted by GJABS
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Train Ticket Splitting
Collapse
X
-
I've done the Crewe to Euston route on London Midlands. Great if it's quiet, you're in no rush, you've got a book to get through and it's coming out of your own pocket. If not, Pendolino all day long.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist -
I thought he cured that with sellotape?Originally posted by vetran View PostYou know Wilmslow is a splitter
Comment
-
It's simple:Originally posted by GreenMirror View PostI have never heard of train ticket splitting before.
Dare I look this up on urban dictionary from client site?
- Given a train journey that passes through stations A, B, and C:
- Ticket from A → C costs x
- Ticket from A → B costs y
- Ticket from B → C costs z
if y + z < x, then get the tickets for A → B and B → C.
The only restriction is that the train on which you travel must stop at B. They don't actually force you to get off and on again though
Comment
-
And sometimes B doesn't even need to be between A and C. In the following link it was a lot cheaper for a ticket from Lancaster to Euston than from Preston (nearer) to Euston. So a commuter bought a cheaper Lancaster ticket and even travelled to Lancaster to start his journey, but got into a bit of hot water:Originally posted by NickFitz View PostIt's simple:
- Given a train journey that passes through stations A, B, and C:
- Ticket from A → C costs x
- Ticket from A → B costs y
- Ticket from B → C costs z
if y + z < x, then get the tickets for A → B and B → C.
The only restriction is that the train on which you travel must stop at B. They don't actually force you to get off and on again though
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/277652...train-tickets/Comment
-
NF managed to explain something without resorting to integration. I owe you a Greggs lunch...Originally posted by NickFitz View PostIt's simple:
- Given a train journey that passes through stations A, B, and C:
- Ticket from A → C costs x
- Ticket from A → B costs y
- Ticket from B → C costs z
if y + z < x, then get the tickets for A → B and B → C.
The only restriction is that the train on which you travel must stop at B. They don't actually force you to get off and on again though
Comment
-
It was a particularly bad case so he's had to resort to gaffa tape.Originally posted by GreenMirror View PostI thought he cured that with sellotape?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Yeh I've done it before. Like you said, if train doesnt stop at split station you may be in trouble.Originally posted by vwdan View PostIt does work, but you need to be careful of the rules. I did it for a week on Open Tickets but got a train which didn't stop at Coventry (The split station).
The guard was alright with me, but did make it clear they should have charged me.
I guess its because you're getting off and station and then getting back on same train in effect. Even though you dont actually do it- so if it doesnt even stop then you're on an invalid train for 2nd part of the journey.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Today 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Yesterday 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Yesterday 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16
- HMRC leaves 37,000 contractors’ nil-liability question in the air Sep 11 07:42
- Pay 2% to protect a ‘loan’. Settle it for 1–2%? The contractor debt mystery deepens Sep 10 06:30

Comment