Originally posted by HugeWhale
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Have you ever been arrested?, background screening question
Collapse
X
-
That was NAT. They arrested him for wasting police time, after he admitted he made up the gerbil story. -
Some folks round here will pay extra for that...Originally posted by Man Utd View PostNo and No.
Got bound over for a year.
His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
In my book that would be breaking the law. watch this space.Originally posted by sal View PostIf they do care, they likely have the means to to get your record, ROA or notComment
-
I know, they hate the competition.Originally posted by GreenMirror View PostThe things IBs hate most are lieing, bankruptcy and arrests for financial crime.
.Comment
-
Was the question verbal or in writing?Originally posted by IPMAN View PostIn respect to a prospective IT Contract with an investment bank who are using an external background screening partner, are they entitled to ask the question i.e. Have you ever been arrested?
thanks
If in writing there will *usually* be a section referring to the ROA 1974.Comment
-
Unlike RH who actually abused a hamster: -Originally posted by Old Greg View PostThat was NAT. They arrested him for wasting police time, after he admitted he made up the gerbil story.
https://forums.contractoruk.com/gene...ml#post1488728Comment
-
In writing and yes there was reference to ROA 1974 right at the topOriginally posted by Zigenare View PostWas the question verbal or in writing?
If in writing there will *usually* be a section referring to the ROA 1974.Comment
-
What did the questionnaire say in regards to "ROA 1974"?Originally posted by IPMAN View PostIn writing and yes there was reference to ROA 1974 right at the top
Did it say that the role was exempt from the ROA 1974?
Applying for work
Once your convictions are spent, the Act gives you the right not to disclose them when applying for jobs, unless the role is exempt from the Act. Most employers with jobs covered by the Act will only ask for ‘unspent’ convictions. If they ask about all convictions, you should check what level of disclosure they’re entitled to, and if it’s only a basic DBS disclosure, then this may be an ineligible check and you can legally withhold any spent convictions.Last edited by Zigenare; 22 May 2018, 12:30.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment