• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Where our tax goes :(

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Lucy
    There was no Arms Race before Reagan and Thatcher.

    So why did Jimmy Carter agree the SALT treaties with the soviet Union?
    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Lucy
      There was no Arms Race before Reagan and Thatcher.

      Oh dear, Luce.
      Hard Brexit now!
      #prayfornodeal

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Lucy
        There was no Arms Race before Reagan and Thatcher.
        I think you meant that there was no arms race AFTER Reagan and Thatcher.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Lucy
          FFS the cold war ended because of nuclear weapons, go and learn some history.

          Do you really think it's a good idea to not maintain them when nutters like North Korea and Iran hold them ?
          Actually the cold war started, middled and ended becuase of nukes. If there were no nukes it would have been a hot war.

          Go learn some tactics

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Sockpuppet
            Actually the cold war started, middled and ended becuase of nukes. If there were no nukes it would have been a hot war.

            Go learn some tactics

            The cold war started because post WW2 Stalin decided it was a good idea to force his evil empire upon Asia and Europe, ie the SU started rolling out it's communist states years before it tested it's nukes.

            Nuclear wepons by and large 'kept the peace' in the global sense (excluding proxy wars etc).

            I do know tactics. ta.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by DodgyAgent
              So why did Jimmy Carter agree the SALT treaties with the soviet Union?
              The SALT treaties were unverifiable. The SU did not reduce it's nuclear weapons effort at all during that period.

              Carter, unlike Reagan, thought you could negotiate with an evil empire. Reagan decided tactically the US could beat them in an Arms Race (and did) !!!

              Comment


                #37
                I can hardly believe we had this argument.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Lucy View Post
                  I can hardly believe we had this argument.
                  Um, that is an oldie.
                  Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a champion.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
                    Um, that is an oldie.
                    I know I was looking for something else - it feels like a million years ago.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
                      1) What is wrong with our current nuclear arsenal ?
                      They'll start leaking in a few years...
                      ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X